My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO_1991-2006
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
Y
>
YOSEMITE
>
2450
>
4400 - Solid Waste Program
>
PR0440074
>
COMPLIANCE INFO_1991-2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/29/2021 10:26:30 AM
Creation date
7/3/2020 11:19:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
4400 - Solid Waste Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
FileName_PostFix
1991-2006
RECORD_ID
PR0440074
PE
4461
FACILITY_ID
FA0001086
FACILITY_NAME
MANTECA PUBLIC WORKS
STREET_NUMBER
2450
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
YOSEMITE
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
MANTECA
Zip
95336
APN
24130050
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
2450 W YOSEMITE AVE
P_LOCATION
04
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sfrench
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\SW\SW_4461_PR0440074_2450 W YOSEMITE_.tif
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
413
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CEASE AND DESIST ORDER NO. <br /> CITY OF MANTECA AND CITY OF LATHROP <br /> SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY <br /> 5. Order No 97-115 Effluent Limitation C.5. states: <br /> "Survival of aquatic organisms in 96 hour bioassays of undiluted waste shall be no less than: <br /> Minimum for any one bioassay--------------------------------70% <br /> Median for any three or more consecutive bioassays 90%" <br /> 6. Since the adoption of Order 97-115 in June 1997 and continuing through March 1998, the City of <br /> Manteca violated the Order's effluent bioassay requirement, consistently reporting 0 % survival. <br /> However,weekly sampling results for all of April and May 1998 have since been in compliance with <br /> Order No. 97-115. <br /> 7. The City of Manteca has taken corrective action measures and since April 1998 has been able to reduce <br /> the ammonia levels in the effluent by changing treatment plant operations to partially nitrify the <br /> ammonia. The change in plant operation seemingly corrected their acute toxicity problems. In addition, <br /> the City of Manteca has investigated the use of alternative bioassay test species as allowed by the <br /> EPA testing procedures. It is unclear whether these corrective actions will be long lasting and <br /> consistent over time. The toxicity problems associated to high ammonia concentrations in their <br /> discharge may reoccur once excess treatment plant capacity is loss, due to population growth, and <br /> operation flexibility is limited or may reoccur due to difficulties in nitrifying colder wastewater in <br /> winter months. Further investigation of these two concerns, treatment operations and/or a change in <br /> test species, is necessary to determine if these corrective actions will be long lasting and consistent <br /> over time. <br /> 8. Board's staff have met with City of Manteca representatives to stress the importance of <br /> consistently meeting the permit and to work with the City in finding a solution to the problem. <br /> 9. The City of Manteca continues to diligently work on this problem, and City staff are trying within <br /> their resources to find a solution to this problem. Recent improvements in the Bioassay survival rate <br /> is indicative that the City of Manteca is proceeding in the right direction but additional studies and/or <br /> corrective measures are necessary to demonstrate an ability to maintain year round compliance. <br /> 10. On 24 July 1998, in Sacramento, California, after due notice to the Discharger and all other affected <br /> persons,the Board conducted a public hearing at which evidence was received to consider a Cease and <br /> Desist Order to establish a time schedule to achieve compliance with waste discharge requirements. <br /> 11. Issuance of this order is exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act <br /> (Public Resources Code, Section 21000, et seq.), in accordance with Section 15321 (a)(2), Title 14, <br /> California Code of Regulations. <br /> 12. Any person adversely affected by this action of the Board may petition the State Water Resources <br /> Control Board (Sate Board)to review the action. The petition must be received by the State Board <br /> Office of the Chief Counsel,P.O. Box 100, Sacramento, California 95812-0100,within 30 days of <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.