Laserfiche WebLink
® Page 1 of 1 <br /> Benjamin Escotto [EH] <br /> From: Taylor, Kevin [Kevin.Taylor@Ca[Recycle.ca.gov] <br /> Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2011 8:32 AM <br /> To: De Bie, Mark; Benjamin Escotto [EH]; Robert McClellon [EH] <br /> Subject: FW: 39-AA-0048 Martin Dairy insp red staff report.docx <br /> Attachments: 39-AA-0048 Martin Dairy insp red staff report.docx <br /> I hope this represents what was discussed. <br /> From: De Bie, Mark <br /> Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2011 12:25 PM <br /> To: Taylor, Kevin <br /> Subject: FW: 39-AA-0048 Martin Dairy insp red staff report.docx <br /> Sure, as soon as you finalize the document per my request on the attached draft. Don't forget to take off the <br /> watermark when you're done. <br /> CCR Title 14,Section 18083(a)(4)(A), states that the Department may approve an alternate inspection frequency <br /> for exempt sites if such an action will not result in adverse impact on public health and safety and the <br /> environment. it was documented in 8/2004 that there was tomato pumice on site and that it was land applied. <br /> Since 2004, the facility has not received or land applied agricultural/cannery waste. There have been no <br /> violations noted by the LEA since activities began in 2004. <br /> So in 2004 there was documentation that pumice was applied? In an inspection report? It has not been used for <br /> 7 years? So why have it? What I'm looking for is something that indicates that the waste is received and tilled in <br /> within x hours or something that speaks to how impacts are avoided. What we are allowing is the removal of <br /> LEA oversight without anything in the record that says it's ok not to have the LEA check things. Why is it ok? <br /> Why don't we have to worry about this site being inspected. All we have is that it is not used. <br /> From: Taylor, Kevin <br /> Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2011 11:29 AM <br /> To: De Bie, Mark <br /> Subject: FW: 39-AA-0048 Martin Dairy insp red staff report.docx <br /> I know this isn't a high priority, but let's just get it back to them...please. <br /> From: Taylor, Kevin <br /> Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2011 10:13 AM <br /> To: De Bie, Mark <br /> Subject: 39-AA-0048 Martin Dairy insp red staff report.docx <br /> Requested information added. I have the attachments. <br /> 4/13/2011 <br />