Laserfiche WebLink
Musco Family Olive Compan - 5 - 27 July 2006 <br /> and not influenced by the higher conductivity gravel layer encountered between 82 and 80 <br /> feet, respectively. Overall, there appears to be good correlation between well borings MW-12, <br /> MW-17, and MW-18. <br /> Conclusions <br /> Based on this evaluation, it appears several of the wells associated with the Detection <br /> Monitoring Program (DMP) (W-2 and MW-11) are inadequate and do not meet the <br /> requirements of Title 27 or WDR No. R5-2005-0024. Wells W-2 and MW-11, when initially <br /> installed, were monitoring a perched water zone that has since dried as indicated by declining <br /> water levels. Well W-2 is supposed to be the point of compliance well for the southern end of <br /> the surface impoundments. Well MW-11 is supposed to be the furthest upgradient or <br /> background well for the surface impoundments. <br /> It is Board staff's judgment that first encountered ground water occurs at an interval between <br /> an approximate depth of 50 to 70 feet bgs. This judgment is based on correlating lithologies <br /> from boring logs W-2, MW-11, MW-12, MW-17, and MW-18 with additional information from <br /> logs W-1 and W-3. Currently, only one well (MW-17) appears to be installed at an <br /> appropriate depth to monitor shallow ground water beneath the surface impoundments. The <br /> current shallow well system (W-2, MW-11, and MW-17) does not adequately monitor the <br /> shallow ground water beneath the surface impoundments. <br /> Boring logs for deep wells MW-12 and MW-18 identify a stratum of highest hydraulic <br /> conductivity above deep ground water. This stratum was encountered at depths between 80 <br /> and 82 feet bgs. This zone of highest hydraulic conductivity is not being monitored. <br /> Therefore, the current deep well system for the surface impoundments is out of compliance <br /> with Title 27 and the requirements of the DMP. <br /> Board staff makes the following recommendations for the DMP: <br /> 1. Well W-2 was installed as a downgradient point of compliance well but has not yielded <br /> groundwater samples since October 2004. Construction and installation of well W-2 <br /> does not meet the ASTM, DWR, or Title 27 Monitoring Well Performance Standards. <br /> Well W-2 monitors a perched zone downgradient of the surface impoundments and <br /> shall remain in-place if the Discharger can provide a copy of the well permit from the <br /> authorizing agency. If a copy of the permit cannot be provided, the Discharger must <br /> drill out and reconstruct well W-2 to a corresponding depth monitoring the perched <br /> zone. Regardless of whether or not a well permit is available, the Discharger must drill <br /> and construct a companion well to W-2 to monitor the shallow groundwater zone <br /> identified between 50 and 70 feet bgs. The well boring should be continuously cored <br /> for logging purposes. The Discharger is required to reconstruct well W-2 and install a <br /> companion well. Both these wells shall meet the ASTM, DWR, and Title 27 Monitoring <br /> Well Performance Standards. <br /> 2. MW-11 was installed as an upgradient well at a depth to monitor the perched zone and <br /> should remain in place. The Discharger shall continue to monitor this well for depth to <br /> water and report their findings as required in the Monitoring and Reporting Program No. <br />