My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0012649
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
W
>
WASHINGTON
>
2201
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0524706
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0012649
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/7/2020 9:16:03 AM
Creation date
7/7/2020 9:02:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0012649
RECORD_ID
PR0524706
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0016587
FACILITY_NAME
PORT OF STOCKTON
STREET_NUMBER
2201
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
WASHINGTON
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95203
APN
14503001
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
2201 W WASHINGTON ST
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
272
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CO;NCLUS ION5 REGARDIW,, TEST RESULTS <br /> From these data it appears that the tank never leaked prior to <br /> removal and that all spilled material was recovereJ. One of the <br /> fuel lines from the tank to the boiler room might have leaked, <br /> and if it did, the contaminated area takes the form of a south- <br /> east plume between the railroad tracks and the warehouse. <br /> An alternate explanation could be that of casual surface spills <br /> along the railroad tracks. Such spill were probably common over <br /> the years in an industrial area such the port. The upper picture <br /> in Figure 7 shows a surface hydrocarbon spill of unknown origin <br /> that happened subsequent to both excavations. Heavy, diesel fuel <br /> using equipment can be seen in the background of both pictures <br /> in Figure 7 . <br /> At this time there is no evidence of groundwater contamination. <br /> Ione of the samples from the bottom of either excavation showed <br /> any contamination. <br /> However, the limits of the hydrocarbon contamination shown in <br /> the samples above have not been delineated and all of the <br /> contaminated soil probably has not been removed. <br /> RECO11%ENDAT IONS <br /> 1 . Bore Shand auger holes, about 4" in diameter, to a depth of <br /> 6 feet as shown on Figure 9. If a hand auger will not do the <br /> job, use an auger hole drilling, truck. A hand auger is sug- <br /> gested because of the hole depth and in order to reduce <br /> Cos t5 . <br /> 2. If a hand auger is used, collect samples by driving a 2" x <br /> 6" brass tube mounted on a long, "T" handle into the bottom <br /> of holes P- 1 through P-8. Have a representative from a cer- <br /> tified laboratory collect the samples, using all QA/QC de- <br /> scribed previously. If a truck mounted auger is used, take <br /> samples using 2 ' x 6 ' brass tubes mounted in a split spoon <br /> sampler . In either case, all sampling devices are to be <br /> cleaned between uses in a three wash and rinse, TSP indus- <br /> trial strength solution. If a hand drive sampler is used, <br /> take the samples Irom the bottom of the tube to ensure that <br /> debris which might fall into the hole will not contaminate <br /> the sample. A represntative of Hunter do Associates will be <br /> present to witness the drilling, and sampling procedures and <br /> to log the sample holes. <br /> 3. Fill the bore holes with grout , to he witnessed by the DHS. <br /> 4. Test the samples from P-I through P-5 for BTEX using EPA <br /> method....8.020__.._(p.rep•...5030)-, <br /> 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.