Laserfiche WebLink
a <br /> PUBLI(!HEALTH SERVICES =�a .�o` <br /> SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY <br /> ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION <br /> Karen Furst, M.D., M.P.H., Health Officer r{«FORN�P. <br /> 304 East Weber Avenue, Third Floor • Stockton, CA 95202 <br /> 209/468-3420 <br /> KEN AND ED ENDICH 'JAN 1 7 2002 <br /> TOP FILLING STATION <br /> 1428 E MARKET STREET <br /> STOCKTON CA 95205-5531 <br /> RE: Top Filling Station SITE CODE: 1294 <br /> 101 S. Wilson Way <br /> Stockton CA 95205 <br /> San Joaquin County Environmental Health Department(EHD) has reviewed Quarterly Monitoring <br /> Reports dated July 31, 2000, March 23, 2001, May 14, 2001,August 30, 2001, December 24, 2001 <br /> and the faxed copies of the analytical results from the two multi-level wells (MW6 and MW7)which <br /> were installed on September 24, 2001 and sampled December 12, 2001 that was submitted by <br /> Advanced GeoEnvironmental, Inc. on behalf of the above referenced site and has the following <br /> comments. <br /> The July 31,2000, Quarterly Report doesn't have well data sheets for VW 1 B, VW2B, or VW3A. The <br /> well data sheet for VW2A shows the total depth of the well as 40 feet. VW21B is 40 feet deep. The <br /> well data sheet for VW36 shows the total depth of the well as 63 feet. VW3A is 63 feet deep. <br /> Analytical results on the lab data sheets for these wells have been switched on the Groundwater <br /> Analytical Table in the report except for the analyses performed by McCampbell Analytical Inc. <br /> laboratory. <br /> The March 23, 2001, Quarterly Report contains well data sheets and the Chain of Custody for the <br /> water samples collected with well identification changes. Depth to water when the samples were <br /> collected was about 38 feet below surface grade (bsg) so VW2B and VW3B should have been dry as <br /> reflected by the changes on the well data sheets and the Chain of Custody. <br /> The May 14, 2001 Quarterly Report contains well data sheets and the Chain of Custody for the water <br /> samples collected with well identification changes again. The well data sheet for VW3B indicates the <br /> well was dry and the Chain of Custody has no time of collection for one of the water samples. The <br /> McCampbell Analytical laboratory data sheets shows non-detect results for VW3A sample. The <br /> Groundwater Analytical Table in the report shows non detect for vW3B and has the concentrations on <br /> the laboratory data sheets as the results for VW3A. <br /> It is obvious that there is confusion about the identification of the nested vapor wells. The <br /> identification of these wells should be clearly marked on the well head. Water sample identification on <br /> well data sheets and the Chain of Custody must be performed more carefully. The above data must <br /> be reviewed, explained and corrected immediately. <br /> The reports show the results of the quarterly groundwater monitoring and sampling events that took <br /> place at this site from June 21, 2000 to August 14, 2001. Results of the sample analyses show <br /> methyl-tertiary butyl ether(MtBE) was detected in groundwater samples from wells MW-1, MW-2, MW- <br /> 3, VW-1B, VW2B, VW1C,VW-2A, VW-3A, and VW36 with concentrations as high as 440,000µg/I <br /> (VW3B on 6/21/00). Benzene, toluene, ethyl benzene, and xylene (BTEX) compounds were detected <br /> in the groundwater samples from all the wells, with benzene concentrations as high as 39,000 pg/I <br /> (VW1C on 10/27/00). Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons as gasoline (TPH-g) was also detected in all the <br /> wells with concentrations as high as 300,000µg/l (VW3B on 6/21/00). Ethylene dibromide (EDB), 1,2 <br /> Dichloroethane (1,2 DCA) and Tertiary butanol (TBA) were also detected in ground water samples <br /> collected from the site. <br /> A Division of San Joaquin County Health Care Scrvices <br />