My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0008881
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
W
>
WATERLOO
>
2358
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0543607
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0008881
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/10/2020 10:44:07 PM
Creation date
7/9/2020 10:25:52 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0008881
RECORD_ID
PR0543607
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0006343
FACILITY_NAME
STOCKTON MOBIL 3*
STREET_NUMBER
2358
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
WATERLOO
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95205
APN
14118221
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
2358 E WATERLOO RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
70
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 <br /> TANK CLOSURE REPORT--BEACON STATION #419 -2- <br /> 2350 Waterloo Road, Stockton, CA <br /> AMV Project No 19011 03 <br />' On October 22, 1993, the existing USTs were removed Removal of the tanks was witnessed <br /> by Mr. Jake Stryd of Ultramar, as well as Ms L. T. Briggs, Environmental Health <br />' Representative, County of San Joaquin Mr Ron Hiltscher, Fire Prevention Inspector, City of <br /> Stockton, inspected the tanks and monitored the oxygen content and lower explosive limit of <br /> vapors within the tanks prior to removal The tanks were inspected upon removal All three <br />' USTs were found to be in good condition and no holes were observed The tanks were <br /> transported by H & H Ship Service Company, Inc , to their facility in San Francisco, California, <br /> for metal salvaging <br />' A total of six soil samples were collected for analysis from the former tank basin on October 22, <br /> P Y <br />' 1993 One soil sample was collected from each end of the former UST locations. Soil sample <br /> locations are illustrated in Figure 3 The sample locations were designated by Ms. Briggs and <br /> confirmed by Mr. Stryd Soil samples collected in the tank basin on October 22, 1993, were <br />' collected at depths ranging from approximately 17 to 20 feet below grade The soil samples <br /> were analyzed for concentrations of TPHg, BTEX, total lead, and ethylene dibromide (EDB) <br /> Soil samples that contained concentrations of total lead equal to or greater than 13 milligrams <br /> per kilogram (mg/kg) were also analyzed for soluble lead <br /> The soil samples were collected by driving a 2-inch-diameter brass tube into the soil retrieved <br /> with an excavator bucket. Analytical results from soil samples collected from the tank basin on <br /> October 22, 1993, are compiled in Table 1 Concentrations of petroleum hydrocarbon <br /> constituents were detected in soil samples collected from five of the six locations Copies of <br />' certified analytical reports from the former UST basin are contained in Appendix A <br />' 3.0 PRODUCT PIPING TRENCH SOII, SAMPLING <br /> On October 26, 1993, seven soil samples were collected from the former pump island area at <br /> the subject site. Locations of the former product distribution lines and the fuel dispensers are <br /> illustrated on Figure 4, along with sample collection locations P-1 through P-7. Soil sample <br />' locations were designated by Ms Briggs Soil samples were collected from approximately <br /> 2 5 feet to 4 feet below grade Soil samples were submitted for analysis of BTEX, TPHg, total <br /> lead, and EDB. Soil samples that contained concentrations of total lead equal to or greater than <br />' 13 mg/kg were analyzed for soluble lead Copies of certified soil sample analytical reports for <br /> product piping samples are presented in Appendix B Soil sample analytical results are compiled <br /> in Table 2. BTEX, TPHg, and EDB were not detected in any of these samples above the <br /> reported detection limit <br /> 9 01 <br />' RPr020 ECD <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.