My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0009051
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
W
>
WASHINGTON
>
223
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545813
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0009051
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/10/2020 1:32:32 AM
Creation date
7/9/2020 1:21:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0009051
RECORD_ID
PR0545813
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0000713
FACILITY_NAME
RIPONA MARKET
STREET_NUMBER
223
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
WASHINGTON
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
RIPON
Zip
95366
APN
26106014
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
223 W WASHINGTON ST
P_LOCATION
05
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ms Lon Duncan • May 17,2001 <br /> San Joaquin County <br /> Page 2 <br /> Then the sampler is pushed another foot to collect the sample Stainless steel sample <br /> rings, caps and Teflon are provided " <br /> "The CPT/Hydropunch holes are grouted using a support rig The grouting procedure <br /> consists of pushing a tremie pipe to the test hole termination depth Bentonite grout is <br /> then pumped under pressure as the tremae pipe is pulled from the hole, Various <br /> Regional Water Control Boards have reviewed and approved this methodology The <br /> support ng is also capable of coring through asphalt or concrete to allow for CPT <br /> penetration " <br /> The estimated cost for 5 soil borings using CPT technology for the vertical definition at <br /> depths of 60 to 150 feet in depth, is between $14,500 and $26, 000 <br /> An alternative method, less costly and preferable to the client, is the use of Geoprobe <br /> technology as proposed in the previously submitted work plan and addendum A local <br /> drilling contractor reports having success in drilling to depths of 100 feet in San Joaquin <br /> County using Geoprobe technology The drilling contractor suggests drilling two <br /> adjacent holes per sampling location, one for soil sampling, and the other for water <br /> sample collection at the proposed sample depths This will prevent possible cross <br /> contamination between sample points This procedure is less costly, estimated at under <br /> $10,000, and will allow access to the back yard to the northeast of the former <br /> underground storage tanks The bore holes will be destroyed by grouting using a tremae <br /> • pipe in a similar manner to the boring destruction method described in the CPT <br /> technology described above <br /> MJ Kloberdanz and Associates propose the installation of 5 soil borings and 5 <br /> groundwater sampling borings to 60 feet or ten feet into a competent clay or aquitard If <br /> the lateral and vertical extent of the soil and groundwater impact remains undefined, an <br /> additional addendum to the work plan describing the additional areas and depths to be <br /> investigated and the methods proposed to gain access and conduct the investigation will <br /> be submitted <br /> Soil and water samples collected in the saturated zone below the water table will be <br /> obtained from separate direct push borings Water for laboratory analysis will be <br /> sampled at five-foot intervals below the capillary fringe in all borings Soil samples will <br /> be collected above and below the saturated zone for laboratory analysis in the <br /> immediately adjacent test borings All soil and water samples collected for laboratory <br /> analysis will be analyzed for petroleum hydrocarbons by EPA Method 8015m, volatile <br /> aromatic hydrocarbons (benzene, toluene, ethyl benzene, and xylenes) by EPA Method <br /> 8020, and fuel additives and oxygenates including 1,2 dichlorethane, ethylene dibromide, <br /> ethanol, and methanol by EPA Method 8260B <br /> Regardless of the method used, the SWRCB UST Cleanup Fund will need to approve the <br /> site investigation costs before the work can proceed While use of the CPT is a clever <br /> method for this type of investigation, equipment availability is limited to select <br /> companies in the Sacramento and San Francisco Bay area We are concerned that <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.