Laserfiche WebLink
Ms Lon Duncan • May 17,2001 <br /> San Joaquin County <br /> Page 2 <br /> Then the sampler is pushed another foot to collect the sample Stainless steel sample <br /> rings, caps and Teflon are provided " <br /> "The CPT/Hydropunch holes are grouted using a support rig The grouting procedure <br /> consists of pushing a tremie pipe to the test hole termination depth Bentonite grout is <br /> then pumped under pressure as the tremae pipe is pulled from the hole, Various <br /> Regional Water Control Boards have reviewed and approved this methodology The <br /> support ng is also capable of coring through asphalt or concrete to allow for CPT <br /> penetration " <br /> The estimated cost for 5 soil borings using CPT technology for the vertical definition at <br /> depths of 60 to 150 feet in depth, is between $14,500 and $26, 000 <br /> An alternative method, less costly and preferable to the client, is the use of Geoprobe <br /> technology as proposed in the previously submitted work plan and addendum A local <br /> drilling contractor reports having success in drilling to depths of 100 feet in San Joaquin <br /> County using Geoprobe technology The drilling contractor suggests drilling two <br /> adjacent holes per sampling location, one for soil sampling, and the other for water <br /> sample collection at the proposed sample depths This will prevent possible cross <br /> contamination between sample points This procedure is less costly, estimated at under <br /> $10,000, and will allow access to the back yard to the northeast of the former <br /> underground storage tanks The bore holes will be destroyed by grouting using a tremae <br /> • pipe in a similar manner to the boring destruction method described in the CPT <br /> technology described above <br /> MJ Kloberdanz and Associates propose the installation of 5 soil borings and 5 <br /> groundwater sampling borings to 60 feet or ten feet into a competent clay or aquitard If <br /> the lateral and vertical extent of the soil and groundwater impact remains undefined, an <br /> additional addendum to the work plan describing the additional areas and depths to be <br /> investigated and the methods proposed to gain access and conduct the investigation will <br /> be submitted <br /> Soil and water samples collected in the saturated zone below the water table will be <br /> obtained from separate direct push borings Water for laboratory analysis will be <br /> sampled at five-foot intervals below the capillary fringe in all borings Soil samples will <br /> be collected above and below the saturated zone for laboratory analysis in the <br /> immediately adjacent test borings All soil and water samples collected for laboratory <br /> analysis will be analyzed for petroleum hydrocarbons by EPA Method 8015m, volatile <br /> aromatic hydrocarbons (benzene, toluene, ethyl benzene, and xylenes) by EPA Method <br /> 8020, and fuel additives and oxygenates including 1,2 dichlorethane, ethylene dibromide, <br /> ethanol, and methanol by EPA Method 8260B <br /> Regardless of the method used, the SWRCB UST Cleanup Fund will need to approve the <br /> site investigation costs before the work can proceed While use of the CPT is a clever <br /> method for this type of investigation, equipment availability is limited to select <br /> companies in the Sacramento and San Francisco Bay area We are concerned that <br />