Laserfiche WebLink
`1 Mr.Nuel Henderson <br /> Page 3 of 4 <br /> Laboratory analysis consisted of gasoline oxygenates [tert-butyl alcohol (TBA), methyl tert-butyl <br /> ether (MTBE), di-isopropyl ether (DIPE), ethyl tert-butyl ether (ETBE) and tert-amyl methyl <br /> ether (TAME)], ethylene dibromide (EDB) and 1,2-dichloroethane (1,2-DCA) by EPA Method <br /> 826013; total petroleum hydrocarbons as gasoline (TPHg) by EPA Method 8015M; benzene, <br /> toluene, ethylbenzene and xylenes (BTEX) by EPA Method 8021 B; general minerals by various <br /> EPA Methods; California Analytical Method (CAM) 17 dissolved metals by EPA Method 200.8; <br /> hexavalent chromium (Cr+6) by EPA Method 218.6,bromide (Br)by EPA method 300.0; bromate <br /> (Br03)by EPA Method 300.1; and ORP by the Langelier Method. <br /> Purge water was transferred into labeled 55-gallon drums approved by the Department of <br /> Transportation (DOT). The waste is stored onsite within a secured area. Purge logs are included <br /> in Attachment A. <br /> ` GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS <br /> Remedial Injection Performance Monitoring <br /> Groundwater samples were collected from wells V W I and VW2 on March 28, 2011 and from <br /> wells MW2, MW5, MW1313, VWl and VW2 on May 17, 2011. The samples were analyzed for <br /> ►. pH, temperature, EC, DO, ORP, TPHg, BTEX compounds, gasoline oxygenates, general <br /> minerals, CAM-17 Metals, Cr+6, Br and Br03 to monitor groundwater conditions during the H2O2 <br /> injection pilot testing. A summary of the hydrocarbon and oxygenate results are provided as Table <br /> 3, a summary of the groundwater chemistry results are provided as Table 4, and a summary of the <br /> dissolved metals results are provided as Table 5. Attachment B contains laboratory reports and <br /> chain of custody documentation.Notable results are summarized as follows: <br /> • In general, the shallow groundwater quality shows signs of improvement with declining <br /> conductivity and total dissolved solids. However, several metals and compounds continue <br /> to exceed drinking water MCLS. <br /> TPHg and benzene were detected in all sampled wells during the March 28, 2011 and May <br /> 17, 2011 sampling events. Since the initiation of remedial H2O2 injections concentrations of <br /> ` TPHg and benzene have declined significantly in wells MW5, MW1313, VW1 and VW2; <br /> However, TPHg and benzene concentrations in MW2 have increased slightly since H2O2 <br /> injections began. Graphs showing concentrations of TPHg and benzene over the last four <br /> years in the performance monitoring wells have been included in Attachment C. <br /> • Cr and Cr+6 were not detected above laboratory detection limits in any of the sampled <br /> wells during the baseline groundwater sampling event in August 2010. Cr+6 was <br /> subsequently detected in wells VWl and VW2 during both the December 23, 2010 and <br /> February 2, 2011 sampling events. Cr+6 was detected in injection well VW2 in March and <br /> May 2011. Additionally, Cr+6 was detected in transition well MW13B on May 17, 2011 <br /> which is supporting evidence that the effect of peroxide injection is being manifested <br /> downgradient of the injection points. <br /> • Br03 was not detected in any sampled well on March 28, 2011; however Br03 was <br /> ` detected during the May 17, 2011 sampling event in wells VWl, VW2 and MW13B at <br /> concentrations of 0.53 parts per million (ppm), 0.35 ppm and 0.46 ppm, respectively. The <br /> L <br /> GAGROUNDZEIROEKIREPORTST=xide Pilot Tesfacportsl2QTR20l l Remedial Prowess Report.doc <br />