My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE_FILE 2
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
W
>
WILSON
>
102
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545890
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE_FILE 2
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/22/2020 11:01:28 AM
Creation date
7/22/2020 10:49:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
FileName_PostFix
FILE 2
RECORD_ID
PR0545890
PE
3526
FACILITY_ID
FA0025958
FACILITY_NAME
ROEK BROTHERS CONSTRUCTION
STREET_NUMBER
102
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
WILSON
STREET_TYPE
WAY
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95205
APN
15502065
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
102 S WILSON WAY
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
227
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Chapter 15: Site Assessment <br /> Pre-Field Work Considerations <br /> September 2012 <br /> There are several tasks to consider prior to beginning field work, such as preparing a work plan, acquiring <br /> appropriate permits,etc.The following is a discussion of important pre-field considerations. Please note that this is <br /> not intended to be all-inclusive, as each LUPT site is unique and has unique requirements. It is important for RPs <br /> and consultants to work with the regulatory agency overseeing the site assessment to ensure that pre-field <br /> considerations have been addressed prior to mobilization for field work. <br /> Work Plan <br /> Submittal of a work plan is required prior to conducting field activities associated with a LUFT site assessment, as <br /> discussed in the Work Plan chapter of this Manual. <br /> Regulatory Requirements and Permits <br /> It is important to identify the regulatory requirements prior to performing an investigation at a LUFT site. <br /> Regulatory permits may be required prior to site assessment (and cleanup phases). Contact the applicable <br /> regulatory agency(i.e.,federal,state,county,and municipality)for details.This section describes typical regulatory <br /> permits that may be required for a LUFT investigation. Additional information may also be available in guidance <br /> documents provided by the regulatory agency. <br /> The RP is required to obtain the proper permits in order to perform work. Permits may be required for ground <br /> disturbance activities such as advancing borings(including CPT points)and constructing and destroying monitoring <br /> wells. Depending on the location of the site, permits are typically obtained from either county or municipal <br /> agencies, such as environmental health/fire departments, water districts, planning departments, and/or building <br /> departments. <br /> If work is being completed in public rights-of-way(sidewalks areas, roads, etc.), an encroachment permit is often <br /> required. If assessment is needed at an off-site location,or if the subject site is no longer owned by the RP,the RP <br /> (or RP's agent)will likely need to obtain an access agreement with the owner(s) of the property where work is to <br /> be conducted. <br /> As part of the well or boring permit process, many regulatory agencies require the property owner to sign forms <br /> indicating that the property owner agrees to have the assessment performed. If he or she refuses to grant <br /> reasonable access,the regulatory agency may require the property owner to conduct the required work at his/her <br /> own expense. This process can be very time-consuming, and should be factored into the schedule for work <br /> completion. <br /> Regulatory Oversight <br /> An inspector from the lead regulatory agency or local oversight agency which has issued a specific permit has the ', N <br /> authority to be present during site work, unless prior approval to proceed without an inspector onsite has been <br /> obtained. Each agency may have its own specific notification requirements, including notification, or lack thereof, <br /> for routine monitoring or maintenance events.The agency has the regulatory authority to reject analytical or field N- <br /> results obtained during field work if the proper inspection arrangements have not been made and there is a <br /> �i <br /> reasonable suspicion that the data are not valid. <br /> It is recommended, and may in fact be required by some regulatory agencies, that the RP and consultant contact <br /> the regulatory agency to schedule an inspection a minimum of three to five business days (or other agreed-upon <br /> interval among RP, consultant, and regulatory agency—the RP is responsible for confirming this interval) before <br /> proposed site work begins. If either the date or the field-work schedule is changed from a previously agreed-upon <br /> time, whichever party first becomes aware of the change notifies the other parties in the manner previously <br /> agreed upon(email,fax,etc.). <br /> California LUFT Manual:September 2012 15-6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.