My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0012190
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
W
>
WILSON
>
102
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545890
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0012190
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/22/2020 12:23:34 PM
Creation date
7/22/2020 11:28:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0012190
RECORD_ID
PR0545890
PE
3526
FACILITY_ID
FA0025958
FACILITY_NAME
ROEK BROTHERS CONSTRUCTION
STREET_NUMBER
102
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
WILSON
STREET_TYPE
WAY
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95205
APN
15502065
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
102 S WILSON WAY
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
257
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
f <br /> requirements, then Ground Zero will recommend re-evaluating air sparging in addition to <br /> vapor extraction The purpose of the VES is to remediate soil to reduce the further leaching <br /> potential of gasoline hydrocarbons into the groundwater The system will include six vapor <br /> extraction wells, a thermal oxidizer for the initial treatment of off-gas followed by a catalytic <br /> oxidizer and a gas phase carbon adsorption system after influent concentrations drop <br /> sufficiently, a blower, a water condenser and associated piping, valves, gauges, and controls <br /> Based on the results of the vapor extraction test conducted by Ground Zero, the radius of <br /> ' influence for each vapor extraction well within the impacted zone averages approximately 30 <br /> feet Wells VW-1 through VW-6 are screened at depth intervals summarized in Table 1 <br /> These extraction wells should be capable of providing air flow throughout the soil containing <br /> ' residual gasoline hydrocarbons (Figure 4) <br /> i <br /> The six existing vapor extraction wells would be connected to a VES to draw hydrocarbon <br /> ' vapors out of the soil The major components of the VES are 1) a regenerative blower <br /> I <br /> system for drawing g v apors from soil, 2) a condensate removal system for removing trapped <br /> ' condensate in the vapor extraction piping, 3) a thermal oxidizer/catalytic oxidizer unit for <br /> treating vapors, 4) gas phase carbon adsorption units and 5) collection system piping, other <br /> associated piping, control valves and instrumentation <br /> The results of the vapor extraction test dictate a wellhead design flow ranging from <br /> approximately 30 to 50 cubic feet per minute (cfm) per well, or a total maximum design flow <br /> of 220 cfm The design vacuum ranges from approximately 15 to 45-inches of water <br /> column Based on the design parameters it is estimated that the VES will operate for <br /> approximately 18 to 36 months The VES may be required to operate beyond this estimated <br /> time if air sparging will be required to assist in reducing gasoline hydrocarbon concentrations <br /> in groundwater to satisfy regulatory agencies, or if clean-up levels of benzene in groundwater <br /> of less than 1 ppb are mandated (see discussion below on groundwater cleanup goals) <br /> ' 42 Groundwater Cleanup Goals <br /> Current State policy dictates that all pollution in water considered of beneficial use by the <br /> State for drinking water, industrial or agricultural purposes must be restored, if feasible, to <br /> background levels Since gasoline hydrocarbons are not naturally occurring in this area, this <br /> usually means restoring groundwater to non-detectable levels of gasoline hydrocarbons <br /> However, the State policy makes an exception to these clean-up levels in the case where best <br /> available technology is the limiting factor in reaching the clean-up goals State policy also makes a provision that when the initial clean-up goal of background levels is not achievable <br /> E using best available technology, or is economically unrealistic, then the discharger may <br /> ' propose to mitigate the discharge to levels that protect the beneficial uses of the groundwater <br /> which for this area not only include primary and secondary drinking water standards, but <br /> also agricultural standards <br /> groundze roXc4 20 <br /> i <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.