Laserfiche WebLink
Y <br /> Work Plan for Additional Site Assessment <br /> and Interim Remediation/Feasibility Testing <br /> ARCO Facility No.5469 <br /> Stockton,California <br /> Page 5 <br /> overlain by,low permeability clayey silts, could potentially;result in ineffective capture of <br /> injected air. Air sparging under these geologic settings could also potentially result in <br /> uneven migration of contaminants and a'greater area of impact. Therefore, Delta does not <br /> propose to evaluate air sparging at this time. <br /> Review of published literature and discussions with the California Regional Water <br /> Quality Control Board (CRWQCB) indicate that'the time involved in remediation using <br /> C-SpargerTM is approximately 3 to 18 "months (S,ee Appendix B). However, -ozone <br /> injection at similar sites has indicated that'oxidation'of high concentrations occurs within <br /> a short period (3 to 6 months), but oxidation of low concentrations occurs over a longer <br /> time period. <br /> The proposed C-SpargerTm well locations were strategically selected to affect the <br /> dissolved extent of the MTBE plume onsite. The design depth of 55 feet for the sparge <br /> wells was selected based on known`impacvto the upper sandy unit. The C-SpargerTM <br /> introduces ozone into groundwater through a 2" by;30" micro-porous tubing, assembled <br /> at the base of the sparge well, that "is designed to generate very small bubbles <br /> (approximately SO micrometers). Based o'n manufacturer's recommendation, installation . <br /> of the sparge wells to approximately 55 feet"bgs should allow for an adequate radius of <br /> influence around each sparge point. Figure 4 presents the location of the sparge points <br /> and their estimated radius of influence. The C-SpargerT"' well-to-well spacing of 25 to 30 <br /> feet provides overlap in treatment areas between the C-SpargerT wells. See Appendix B <br /> for additional information on the C-SpargerTM technology. <br /> Delta proposes to evaluate the results of ozone injection for a period of six months. <br /> During this period, Delta will monitor.;;changes :in the concentration of petroleum <br /> hydrocarbons and other parameters such as dissolved oxygen, ferrous iron, pH, <br /> temperature, and turbidity. The extended testing period (6 months) is required to-evaluate <br /> long term results of ozone injection to groundwater. Delta will prepare and submit <br /> periodic status reports documenting the progress of the interim remediation/feasibility <br /> study. <br /> At the end'.of 6 months of ozone injection, other possible remedial alternatives will be <br /> evaluated if ozone injection is not a viable remedial solution. Delta will prepare and <br /> submit a report incorporating the results o .the interim remediation/feasibility study with <br /> recommendations for final remediation,'; or propose additional feasibility testing,. if <br /> warranted. <br /> P:IARCOU4691Work Plan15469 wrkpin 03-2002.doc <br />