Laserfiche WebLink
Elena K. Manzo <br /> Lead Senior REHS <br /> San Joaquin County <br /> Environmental Health Department -2- February 22, 2018 <br /> Response: The vapor recovery note has been revised to indicate double-wall piping, and <br /> show 3-inch inside 4-inch piping to all tanks. <br /> 5. G.0.5 pipe trench detail, indicates 2"inside 3"FRP Vapor line and remove 2"flex piping option <br /> for product <br /> Response: This detail has been revised to reflect the correct piping. <br /> 6. Dispenser sump crossover piping detail for FRP, indicates 2" in 3" leaving dispenser, and <br /> become 3"to 4". Is this correct? <br /> Response: Yes, that is the correct piping detail. <br /> 7. G.0.2.0 site plan indicates no vapor recovery piping goes to diesel fill sump, however sheet <br /> M.0,5.8 indicates a vapor line is to go to diesel fill sump, and become capped for future use. <br /> Response: G.0.2.0 is correct. Sheet M.0.5.8 has been revised accordingly. <br /> We believe that the above responses, together with the enclosed set of revised plans, address all of the <br /> outstanding issues in your comment email dated February 16, 2018. Please review and approve the <br /> enclosed plans at your earliest convenience. Should you have any questions or require additional <br /> materials, do not hesitate to contact me at ainigues@barghausen.com or the Project Coordinator, Ryan <br /> Bharucha at rbharucha@barghausen.com or at(425) 251-6222. Thank you. <br /> Respectfully, <br /> M. Alexia Inigues <br /> Project Planner <br /> OV/RB/hd/mai <br /> 17866c.020.docx <br /> enc: As Noted <br /> cc: Gurpartap (Gary) Singh, Grin Investments, Inc. <br /> Jay S. Grubb, Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. <br /> Daniel B. Goalwin, Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. <br /> Ryan Bharucha, Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. <br />