Laserfiche WebLink
q Tia <br /> G <br /> I <br /> ). H. KLEINFELDER & ASSOCIATES <br /> ["' Alternatives will be compared based on: <br /> ? 1. Technical considerations <br /> 2. owner considerations and cast <br /> fA 3. Impact mitigation <br /> 4 � <br /> The sequence of activities to arrive at the final alternative for <br /> construction is as follows: <br /> a Ground Water Modeling -- Section 3.1 <br /> k , <br /> o Remedial Alternative Evaluation and Selection - Section 3.7 <br /> o Construction of the Selected Alternative - Section 3.9 <br /> k o Start up of the System <br /> The specific scheduling sequence and duration of activities are presented <br /> in Section 4 and shown in Figure 4.1.1. <br /> F; <br /> 3.8 REMEDIAL ALTERNATIVE DESIGN <br /> OBJECTIVE <br /> ._.� The objective is to develop a detailed design of the selected remedial <br /> r alternative to facilitate the preparation of final engineering drawings <br /> and specifications. <br /> APPROACH <br /> 1 _ <br /> The design of the selected remedial alternative will be developed using <br /> technical data gathered from previous field investigations. The design <br /> package will include: <br /> £ o Engineering design criteria and reasons for the selection of <br /> these criteria for the chosen alternative. <br /> L a Plan view drawings and layouts of the overall site facilities, <br /> 'y. <br /> and contaminated areas. <br /> t <br /> w <br /> 33-87-887 19 <br /> i <br />