Laserfiche WebLink
I. H. KLEINFELDE'R &ASSOCIATES <br /> R, APPROACH <br /> The ground water treatment options, + <br /> r ons Presented as remedial alternatives in <br /> Section 3.7, will yield certain fractions of product/waste in addition to <br /> reclaimed ground water. The air stripping technique will result in the <br /> + = discharge of gaseous fractions of hydrocarbons Y to the atmosphere. <br /> Depending on the <br /> quantity of discharge per unit of time a <br /> permit may be <br /> required from the local Air Resources Board (see Section 3.10) <br /> Solid waste requiring special management would result from utilization of <br /> the carbon adsorption treatment option ar a second stage carbon filter <br /> affixed to the air - stripping treatment option. In either situation, <br /> expendable carbon filters contaminated with hydrocarbons would necessitate <br /> disposal through an appropriately permitted waste disposal facility. <br /> Recycling/regeneration of the carbon is possible and can be provided by an <br /> outside contractor in lieu of disposal of expendable carbon filters. <br /> f' <br /> Limited quantities of liquid waste are envisioned to result from Zither <br /> � . treatment option presented in Section 3.7. These would be restricted to a <br /> film of hydrocarbon product on treatment equipment surfaces in direct <br /> contact with the contaminated ground water. If such a film is confirmed <br /> an equipment surfaces after remediation is complete and during equipment <br /> dismantling, these surfaces can be readily steam cleaned. The rinse water <br /> " would be containerized for off--site <br /> permitted waste disposal facility, disposal through ea appropriately <br /> ,.; <br /> �q 3,11 LABORATORY ANALYSES TO ASSESS PERFORMANCE OF REMEDIATION TECHNIQUE <br /> OBJECTIVE <br /> Provide for a quantitative means to assess treatment system operating <br /> performance. <br /> I ` <br /> F _ <br /> 33-87--887 <br /> 23 <br />