Laserfiche WebLink
i <br /> 3 1 Flow Rate <br /> I <br /> During the constant rate test the flow rate was controlled by the methods discussed in Section <br /> I 1 A mayor power fluctuations occurred at about 46 minutes into the test The average flow <br /> rate during the test was 1 44 GPM Flow rate data is included in Attachment A in Table Al and in <br /> Figure Al The top graph in Figure Al presents flow rate versus time in a linear format and the <br /> bottom graph presents flow rate versus the logarithm of time for ease of comparison with <br /> drawdown data plots <br /> 32 Drawdown and Recovery Data <br /> IWater level monitoring was conducted between about 13 30 on August 19 and 07 35 on August <br /> 20, 2000 This information is presented in Attachment B in tabular format (Tables BI through <br /> B3) and as hydrographs (showing water surface elevation) of the seven wells monitored as a <br /> part of this pump test (Figures BI through 134) The pumping well, EW-1, and six observation <br /> wells (MW-5, P-3, P-5, P-2, P-4, and P-1) experienced drawdown in response to the test The <br /> first four listed observation wells experienced an interpretable response <br /> Senulogarithmic (seine-log) and double logarithmic (log-log) graphs of drawdown versus elapsed <br /> time since the pump was started are presented in Figure CI through C7 in Attachment C for the <br /> extraction well(Figure C1) and the observation wells (Figure C2 MW-5, Figure C3, P-3, Figure <br /> C4, P-5,Figure C5, P-2, Figure C6, P-4, and Figure C7, P-1) The drawdown data collected <br /> during the constant rate pump test and corresponding elapsed time is included as Tables CI <br /> through C3 <br /> 40 CONSTANT RATE TEST INTERPRETATION <br /> I <br /> 41 Saturated Thickness <br /> The first encountered water bearing formation beneath 2072 West Yosemite Avenue exists in an <br /> H20GEOL A GROUND ATC, CONSULTANCY <br />