Laserfiche WebLink
No HVOCs, other than the PCE and 1,2-DCP, were detected in any of the <br /> groundwater samples collected on-site It should be noted that 1,2-DCA, <br /> which has been detected in off-site domestic wells downgradient of the <br /> site, has not been detected in groundwater samples collected from any of <br /> the on-site monitoring wells <br /> Groundwater samples collected from recovery wells RW-1 through RW-5 <br /> contained up to 140,000 ppb TPH-G, 840 ppb benzene, 18,000 p p b <br /> toluene, 4,500 ppb ethyl benzene, 25,000 ppb total xylenes, 8,100 p p b <br /> MTBE, 21 ppb TAME, 1,100 ppb TBA, and 380 ppb ethanol It should b e <br /> noted that the highest TPH-G, BTEX and TBA concentrations were detected <br /> in groundwater samples collected from recovery well RW-1 to the west, <br /> and the highest MTBE concentration was detected in groundwater samples <br /> collected from recovery well RW-5 to the east Since the highest <br /> hydrocarbon concentrations are present in the recovery wells to the <br /> outside (RW-1 to the west and RW-5 to the east), it is not known at this <br /> time whether the full extent of the plume is being captured with these <br /> existing wells <br /> 9 . 0 GROUNDWATER ELEVATIONS AND FLOW <br /> • The round surface elevation and to of casing elevation <br /> g p g of the n e w <br /> groundwater monitoring and recovery wells were surveyed relative to <br /> mean sea level (msl) by Farley Surveying, Inc of Stockton, California on <br /> September 27, 2000 The northing and easting location of the wells a n d <br /> piezometers were surveyed relative to the California Coordinate System <br /> The benchmark used for this survey was the USGS M 1164-1960 brass c a p <br /> at the southeast corner of Airport Way and West Yosemite Avenue The <br /> survey information is presented in Appendix H <br /> Depths to groundwater were measured in each well prior to sampling on <br /> September 25, 2000 with an electric water level sounder Depth t o <br /> groundwater measurements are presented in Table Four, and groundwater <br /> elevation (potentiometric surface) contours are plotted on Figures 10, 1 1 <br /> and 12 On September 25, 2000, groundwater in the shallow zone (less <br /> than 19-feet bgs) appeared to flow primarily to the north beneath the site <br /> at a gradient of approximately 0 001-feet/foot Groundwater in the 55 t o <br /> 70-feet bgs zone flowed primarily to the south/southeast at a gradient of <br /> 0 003-feet/foot Groundwater in the deeper zone (below 100-feet bgs) <br /> flowed to the southeast at a gradient of 0 0018-feet/foot <br /> Franks One Stop Report — November 2000 <br /> -16- <br />