My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE_1985-2004
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
Y
>
YOSEMITE
>
2450
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0506303
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE_1985-2004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2020 5:02:50 PM
Creation date
7/23/2020 4:28:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
FileName_PostFix
1985-2004
RECORD_ID
PR0506303
PE
2965
FACILITY_ID
FA0001086
FACILITY_NAME
MANTECA PUBLIC WORKS
STREET_NUMBER
2450
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
YOSEMITE
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
MANTECA
Zip
95336
APN
24130050
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
2450 W YOSEMITE AVE
P_LOCATION
04
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
284
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
INFORMATION SHEET ORDER NO. 97-115 (revised) ' -3- <br /> CITY OF MANTECA AND CITY OF LATHROP <br /> SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY <br /> SUBSTANTIATION OF THE PERMIT REVISION REQUEST <br /> The Discharger used computer modeling to predict whether the mixing zone in the San Joaquin River <br /> has enough assimilative capacity to mitigate the toxic effects of the ammonia in their discharge. Worst <br /> case and average case conditions in terms of river and wastewater effluent characteristics were <br /> examined. Acute and chronic mixing zones were predicted using the Comel Mixing Zone Expert <br /> System (CORMIX) computer model, which is one of US EPA's approved mixing zone models for <br /> near-field analysis. <br /> The Discharger proposed the following mitigation options for effluent disposal: <br /> • Maximize land discharge to crop irrigation during the summer months and for as much of the rest <br /> of the year as crop irrigation demand allows. From April to October 1999, the average land <br /> disposal rate is 1.77, 2.91, 2.11, 3.19, 2.23, and 2.05 mgd each month respectively <br /> • Discharge any effluent in excess of agronomic capacity to the San Joaquin River. Based on past <br /> disposal data, it is predicted there will be times during wet weather or crop harvesting that the entire <br /> plant effluent will be discharged to the River. <br /> • When discharging to the San Joaquin River, utilize effluent storage basins to mitigate toxic impacts <br /> of ammonia to aquatic life during periods of low river flow. <br /> • The current configuration of the Discharger's side bank outfall likely causes adverse toxicological <br /> effects to the benthic organisms along the river bottom. A mixing zone using the current outfall <br /> design will continue to adversely affect benthic organisms, and could also impact fish habitat on the <br /> riverbank. As mitigation, the Discharger will install a 12-port diffuser designed to eliminate the <br /> effluent's affect on benthic organisms and fish habitat. The conceptual design of the diffuser is <br /> shown in Attachment C. The twelve 8-inch diameter discharge ports are angled 15 degrees from <br /> horizontal and are located three feet above the river bottom. The ports are at eight-foot centers and <br /> are grouped 105 feet from both river banks to prevent toxic concentrations of ammonia from <br /> contacting the river banks. The discharge diffuser configuration was used in the mixing analyses <br /> discussed below. <br /> MODEL INPUT PARAMETERS <br /> For modeling purposes, river flow conditions were based on San Joaquin River flows measured at <br /> Vernalis modeled by the Department of Water Resources using historic precipitation from 1922 to <br /> 1994, and flow and operation criteria from the VAMP agreement(now part of the SWRCB Decision <br /> 1641). Vernalis is approximately 11 miles upstream of Manteca's discharge point. <br /> The Discharger assumed seasonal variations of river characteristics in their models. For the worst case <br /> model, river flow data from the DWR Vernalis station was compiled and the low river flows of 641 cfs <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.