My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE_1985-2004
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
Y
>
YOSEMITE
>
2450
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0506303
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE_1985-2004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2020 5:02:50 PM
Creation date
7/23/2020 4:28:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
FileName_PostFix
1985-2004
RECORD_ID
PR0506303
PE
2965
FACILITY_ID
FA0001086
FACILITY_NAME
MANTECA PUBLIC WORKS
STREET_NUMBER
2450
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
YOSEMITE
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
MANTECA
Zip
95336
APN
24130050
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
2450 W YOSEMITE AVE
P_LOCATION
04
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
284
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Pat Leary • - 2 - • 16 March 2000 <br /> the amount of sewage because there was no good estimate of the volume of sewage contained in the <br /> storm drain line prior to the rainstorm. The ditch discharges to Little John Creek which discharges to a <br /> slough near French Camp. At approximately 3:30 pm on 11 January 2000, the City took samples of the <br /> ditch contents. BOD, COD, coliform, ammonia,pH and temperature were measured at 5 locations. The <br /> data was submitted to the RWQCB on 3 February 2000. The BOD concentrations ranged from 56 to 93 <br /> mg/l; COD from 323 to 498 mg/l; all coliform samples were greater than 1600 MPN/100 ml; ammonia <br /> levels were 2.93 to 4.86 mg/l;pH ranged from 6.67 to 7.21; and temperatures ranged from 13.2 to 13.8 <br /> Celsius. <br /> The City traced the sewage back to a plugged sewer line. The plugged line had backed up sewage to a <br /> manhole at Yosemite Ave. near Pacific Street. The City found that the grouting on the invert of a sewer <br /> manhole on Yosemite Ave. near Pacific Street had deteriorated, allowing the backed up sewage to <br /> discharge into the soil surrounding the manhole. The sewage migrated within the soil over to the storm <br /> water pipe. There was a capped tee-off to the storm water pipe. The cap had somehow become <br /> damaged, allowing the sewage to enter the storm water pipe. Sewage traveled underground in the storm <br /> water pipe for several hundred yards before being detected in the open storm drainage ditch. <br /> The City's crew cleared out the plug in the sewer line and repaired the damaged manhole. <br /> The City appeared to have made good cleanup efforts to contain the effects of the sewage spill. <br /> The City should take measures to prevent a similar spill from occurring. All sewer manholes should be <br /> checked for grout deterioration, and repairs completed, if needed. Regular sewer maintenance should be <br /> performed to remove plugs before they cause sewage backups. <br /> In the future, if sewage spills do occur, the City should be reminded that the Office of Emergency <br /> Services must be contacted immediately. And, as part of the Standard Provisions of their APDES <br /> permit, they are also required to notify the RWQCB by telephone within 24 hours of the spill, and should <br /> confirm this notification in writing within 5 days. The written notification shall state the nature, time, <br /> duration, and cause of the spill, describe the measures being taken to remedy the spill, and what <br /> measures are taken to prevent recurrence, including,where applicable, a schedule of implementation. <br /> The City must also take all reasonable steps to minimize any adverse effects to receiving waters resulting <br /> from any discharge in violation of their NPDES permit. This includes any additional monitoring as <br /> necessary to determine the nature and impact of the non-complying discharge. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.