Laserfiche WebLink
Transportation and Circulation <br /> The Increased Land Disposal Alternative would result in construction of similar facilities at the WQCF and <br /> construction of additional pipelines to convey effluent to new land disposal areas. This alternative would result in <br /> slightly greater construction-related transportation impacts because a greater number of roadways would be <br /> disturbed and a greater number of construction personnel would be required to construct the pipelines. While it is <br /> likely that construction-related transportation impacts would be less than significant,nonetheless, overall impacts <br /> would be slightly greater than the project.[Greater] <br /> Cultural Resources <br /> The Increased Land Disposal Alternative would require the construction of wastewater treatment and effluent <br /> conveyance pipelines,potentially resulting in impacts related to the disturbance, destruction, and physical or <br /> visual alteration of any previously undiscovered/unrecorded cultural resource sites. Under the project, ground <br /> disturbance and development of new structures would occur,resulting in potentially significant impacts related to <br /> the potential disturbance of undiscovered/unrecorded subsurface archaeological sites and human remains. These <br /> impacts would be reduced to less-than-significant levels after mitigation. However,because the Increased Land <br /> Disposal Alternative would also include new development or ground disturbance, it could also result in the <br /> disturbance of previously undiscovered subsurface archaeological resources and/or human remains. Therefore, <br /> cultural resources impacts would be similar under this alternative.[Similar] <br /> Fisheries and Aquatic Resources <br /> The Increased Land Disposal Alternative would result in greater impacts to fisheries and aquatic resources <br /> compared to the project. The existing WQCF does not comply with one objective of the Thermal Plan. While the <br /> project would increase the effluent discharge rate to 27 mgd,which would result in the exceedance of all three <br /> thermal plan objectives(see Section 4.13, "Fisheries and Aquatic Resources"),mitigation is recommend that <br /> would require the construction of cooling towers at the WQCF. The cooling towers would bring the WQCF's <br /> effluent in compliance with all three objectives of the Thermal Plan and would eliminate the WQCF's existing <br /> exceedance of one Thermal Plan objective. This alternative would not eliminate this exceedance;therefore, <br /> thermal impacts would be greater under this alternative.[Greater] <br /> 7.3.3 ADVANCED WASTEWATER TREATMENT ALTERNATIVE <br /> Because the proposed project includes nitrification-denitrification,tertiary filtration and UV disinfection facilities, <br /> the remaining advanced wastewater treatment options available to the City are microfiltration and reverse osmosis <br /> (MF/RO). RO is a membrane separation process that is used for the removal of dissolved constituents from <br /> wastewater remaining after advanced treatment with tertiary filtration or microfiltration. RO treatment relies on <br /> applied pressure to force water through a semi-permeable membrane while restraining the passage of particulate <br /> and high molecular weight constituents. Membranes exclude ions,but require high pressures to produce the <br /> deionized water. Passage of water through the membrane produces a relatively ion free effluent stream and a <br /> concentrated brine stream. MF occurs prior to RO in order to remove larger organic and inorganic particles that <br /> foul the RO membrane and thus increase membrane resistance to water flow and reduce membrane service life. <br /> The Advanced Wastewater Treatment alternative would involve the implementation of advanced microfiltration <br /> and reverse osmosis (MF/RO)technology. In order to maintain existing water quality and TDS loadings in the <br /> San Joaquin River from the time the WQCF reaches its current permitted capacity of 9.87 mgd ADWF through <br /> the proposed buildout capacity of 27 mgd ADWF, it is estimated that a maximum MF/RO capacity of 21 mgd <br /> would be required(LWA 2007). This alternative assumes that the blending of effluent streams of different <br /> qualities is permitted and,therefore,only a portion of WQCF tertiary effluent would need to undergo MF/RO <br /> prior to blending with non-MF/RO tertiary effluent and discharge to the San Joaquin River. <br /> Manteca WQCF and Collection System Master Plans EIR EDAW <br /> City of Manteca 7-9 Alternatives to the Proposed Project <br />