Laserfiche WebLink
Although no significant water quality impacts were identified for the project,the project would exceed currently <br /> adopted standards for aluminum(although a water effects ratio [WER] study has been completed to identify an <br /> appropriate site-specific objective for total aluminum in the San Joaquin River that is both sufficiently protective <br /> of aquatic life and identifies available assimilative capacity for aluminum in the river under which the WQCF can <br /> discharge its effluent); however,this impact was determined to be less than significant because the current <br /> adopted standard is believed,based on available science,to be overly protective of water quality and aquatic <br /> resources. The MF/RO process would reduce the concentration and loadings of aluminum and other metals in the <br /> effluent compared to the proposed project. This treatment technology is evaluated in the analysis provided below. <br /> ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS <br /> Environmental Impacts <br /> This alternative would increase WQCF treatment capacity to 27 mgd ADWF and would expand the wastewater <br /> collection system and treated effluent disposal system with the same facilities proposed as part of the project. In <br /> addition,this alternative would construct additional facilities within the developed boundaries of the WQCF. <br /> Because similar facilities would be constructed in similar areas,the Advanced Wastewater Treatment Alternative <br /> would have impacts similar to the proposed project for land use and agricultural resources,terrestrial biological <br /> resources, soils and seismicity,paleontological resources,public services and utilities, cultural resources, <br /> transportation and circulation,noise,air quality,visual.[Similar] <br /> Hazardous Materials <br /> Implementation of the Advanced Wastewater Treatment Alternative would maintain WQCF effluent pollutant <br /> loading to the San Joaquin River at the currently permitted 9.87 mgd level as WQCF discharge capacity increases <br /> to 27 mgd. However,advanced wastewater treatment employing MF/RO technology could result in"cross media <br /> impacts,"or the interrelated impacts caused by removal of a pollutant from one medium to one or more other <br /> media. In the case of MF/RO,the process removes a pollutant at a certain concentration from wastewater and <br /> partitions it at a significantly higher concentration in brine and/or residuals. Pollutants, such as metals, are not <br /> destroyed,but transferred from one medium to another. Organic pollutants can be destroyed or converted to other <br /> toxic or non-toxic forms and can also be transferred from one medium to another. It should be noted that in <br /> transferring from one medium to another,the bioavailability of the pollutant may be changed significantly. <br /> MF/RO treatment results in the transfer of pollutants from wastewater into biosolids, air, and/or concentrated <br /> waste streams. Depending on regulatory limits, additional treatment of the biosolids, air, or waste streams may be <br /> required. Therefore,this alternative could result in similar or greater hazardous material impacts.[Similar or <br /> greater] <br /> Surface Water Quality <br /> Because this alternative would maintain WQCF effluent pollutant loading in the San Joaquin River at the <br /> currently permitted 9.87 mgd ADWF level as the WQCF discharge capacity increases,treated effluent pollutant <br /> mass loading to the river would not increase above that realized once the WQCF discharges at its current <br /> permitted capacity of 9.87 mgd ADWF. Similarly,near- and far-field pollutant concentrations would not increase <br /> above those expected to occur once the WQCF discharges effluent at its current permitted capacity. Furthermore, <br /> RO would reduce effluent concentrations of TDS,metals(including aluminum), ammonia, and organic <br /> compounds, and would lower electrical conductivity. While this alternative is projected to reduce pollutant <br /> concentrations in WQCF effluent compared to post-project levels at 27 mgd,the extent of MF/RO treatment <br /> considered in this alternatives analysis would not decrease downstream constituent concentrations from pre- <br /> project(9.87 mgd)conditions; the MF/RO facilities would be designed to maintain downstream TDS and metals <br /> mass loading to the San Joaquin River at pre-project levels. Further,it is anticipated that implementation of the <br /> Advanced Wastewater Treatment Alternative would reduce aluminum levels to below the existing NPDES daily <br /> maximum effluent limit for the parameter. Although effluent pollutant concentrations would decrease with <br /> EDAW Manteca WQCF and Collection System Master Plans EIR <br /> Alternatives to the Proposed Project 7-10 City of Manteca <br />