My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FIELD DOCUMENTS
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
Y
>
YOSEMITE
>
1160
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0517411
>
FIELD DOCUMENTS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/27/2020 12:51:53 PM
Creation date
7/27/2020 10:53:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
FIELD DOCUMENTS
RECORD_ID
PR0517411
PE
2950
FACILITY_ID
FA0013411
FACILITY_NAME
PAYLESS SHOE STORE
STREET_NUMBER
1160
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
YOSEMITE
City
MANTECA
Zip
95337
APN
21902033
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
1160 W YOSEMITE
P_LOCATION
04
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
111
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
cieotogieat Technics Inc. _ <br /> Purdom&Bettencourt Page 2 <br /> SGWI Report <br /> Project No.: 9542 <br /> September 7,2001 <br /> analysis. The remainder of the sample was used frn eolo is <br /> were capped with plastic end caps, labeled and placed ia cooler at logging.0 Celsiules <br /> s forltransport <br /> to the laboratory following Chain of Custody protocol. <br /> The GeoProbe borings were advanced t 24- <br /> feet at 5-foot intervals for geologic logging and laboratory ana yeses: Soil samples were <br /> The 15-foot soil sample from each borehole was submitted to Castle Analytical in Atwater, <br /> CA for analysis. Since only selected samples were to be submitted for laboratory analysis, a <br /> screening process was used to gather additional information through field observation. This <br /> information was used to determine which samples were to be analyzed. <br /> The following characteristics were noted in the screening process: <br /> • sediment type, especially grain size and clay content <br /> • moisture content <br /> • visible evidence of contamination, i.e., color change due to reduction of iron or <br /> discoloration from hydrocarbons and other pollutants <br /> • readings above background on an organic vapor meter (OVM), a portable photo <br /> ionization detector that uses a 10.0 eV lamp to detect hydrocarbonrange <br /> compounds. <br /> Boring logs, providing sediment description using the USCS and field observations, were <br /> maintained by Michael Niemi, a geologist for GTI: The boring logs are included in <br /> Appendix C. II� <br /> 1.2 Groundwater Sample Collection r <br /> l <br /> Upon reaching the bottom of the hole, a hydropunch type sample tool was used to collect a <br /> groundwater sample from each borehole. The samples were collected by use of a Watera t <br /> type sampling tube and gently transferred into 40-mL VOAs. The bottles were capped, <br /> inverted, tapped, and checked for headspace bubbles. The bottles were then labeled and <br /> placed in a chilled cooler for transport to the laboratory following Chain of Custody <br /> protocol. <br /> Clean surgical gloves were worn at all times in handling of the sample and sampling <br /> equipment. <br /> 1.3 Laboratory Analyses <br /> Soil <br /> One soil sample from each borehole was submitted to Castle Analytical of Atwater, CA <br /> (State Certified Laboratory #2079). They were analyzed for the following: <br /> • Benzene, Toluene, Ethyl Benzene and Xylene (BTEX) by EPA method 8020 <br /> •. Methyl tertiary Butyl Ether(MTBE) by EPA method 8020 <br /> • Total petroleum hydrocarbons as gasoline (TPH-G)-by EPA method 8015/8020 <br /> is <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.