Laserfiche WebLink
Facility and PBR Units Closure Work Plan <br /> 1848 and 1856 Field Ave.,Stockton, California <br /> r <br /> The results of chemical analysis of these six soil samples are presented in the Characterization Summary. <br /> These results do not indicate evidence of a release. Samples were analyzed primarily for copper,the chemical <br /> ` considered the best indicator of a potential release due to its relative immobility. Copper levels in the soil <br /> samples ranged between 4.6 milligrams per kilogram(mg/kg)and 38 mg/kg.Copper was present at 79 mg/kg <br /> ` in the concrete sample,potentially normal depending on the source of the aggregate and cement.No volatile <br /> organic chemicals(VOCs)were detected at the only PBR unit location tested for VOCs(Location 14). <br /> r <br /> 2.2.2 Former Chemical Storage Tanks <br /> Three cross-linked polyethylene chemical storage tanks were formerly outside 1848 Field Avenue,near the <br /> western wall of the building.From north to south,the tanks were used for storage of hydrochloric acid,spent <br /> copper etch solution (cupric chloride with hydrochloric acid) and an aqueous solution of sodium chlorate <br /> r, known as "liquid chlorate replenishment (LCR)". In order to evaluate the potential for releases from these <br /> tanks, Earth Tech planned to collect one soil sample from beneath each of the three tanks. During sample <br /> collection in December 2001, Earth Tech discovered that the material beneath the concrete secondary <br /> containment walls and floor was a sand layer approximately 6 to 8 inches thick underlain by a plastic liner.In <br /> ` order not to damage the liner and thus prevent its reuse, Earth Tech chose to sample the sand inside this <br /> containment system, instead of the underlying soil. Subsequent discussions with the former facility <br /> environmental manager,Lloyd Finley,indicated that the liner and sand layer is continuous beneath all three <br /> tanks. <br /> Sand sample BLI-11 (shown on figures as Location 11)was collected from the sand in the containment liner <br /> under the LCR tank. Sand sample BLI-12(shown on figures as Location 12)was collected from the sand in <br /> the containment liner under the spent copper etch tank. Sand sample BL1-13 (shown on figures as Location <br /> 13)was collected from the sand in the containment liner under the hydrochloric acid tank. <br /> The results of chemical analysis of these three sand samples are presented in the Characterization Summary. <br /> pH levels of 9.8 and 9.3 were detected at sample Locations 11 and 13,respectively,while 350 mg/kg of copper <br /> was detected at Location 12.However,these results are inconclusive with respect to whether or not a release <br /> .. occurred at this location,because the material sampled was within the containment system,the samples may <br /> have been contaminated with concrete dust(the samples were collected after coring through the concrete and <br /> LJWORK1690991GeneraRField WPReldAw WPAug03r"2.doc 5 August2003 <br />