Laserfiche WebLink
In this report we have shown that almost no vadose-zone contamination has been detected <br /> at this site No contaminants have been detected shallower than about 20 feet, and <br /> concentrations have been very low Therefore,we believe that condition 1 above is met <br /> No separate phase product has ever been found at the site, and dissolved-phase <br /> concentrations have not been high enough to suggest that free product night be present <br /> Hence, condition 2 is satisfied <br /> As discussed in section 5 0, there are no surface water bodies or known wells that are in <br /> close proximity to the site in the downgradient direction Although some sewer lines are <br /> located close to the site, these are relatively shallow and are not a potential source of <br /> drinking water Hence,none of the potential receptors listed in condition 3 are threatened by <br /> pollutants remaining in the aquifer <br /> Whether the site meets Condition 4 is somewhat less certain at this time, because of <br /> conflicting results from different wells Changes in the concentrations of various <br /> contaminants have been documented, but the changes have not been predictable nor <br /> consistent and may reflect a complex interplay between changing groundwater levels, <br /> natural attenuation of hydrocarbons, and remedial activities For example, wells near the <br /> fringe of the plume (MW-1, MW-5) have shown a decrease in contaminant levels that <br /> suggests that the plume is shrinking and that there has been a net decrease in the total mass <br /> of contaminants remaining in the aquifer On the other hand, wells in the core of the plume <br /> (MW-2 and SW-1) have demonstrated no improvement in contaminant concentrations, <br /> even after remediation was performed Concentrations in MW-2 have been fairly stable <br /> since early 1996, but these concentrations are not significantly lower than those that existed <br /> at the beginning of the investigation in 1993 Given that MW-2 is located downgradient of <br /> the area of residual soil contamination, it is possible that concentration decreases resulting <br /> from natural attenuation and remediation are being offset by influx of contaminants from <br /> the soil,resulting in little or no net change in groundwater concentrations If this is the case, <br /> soil concentrations will decline over time and lead to a corresponding, though delayed, <br /> decrease in groundwater concentrations <br /> In view of the fact that all directives of San Joaquin County PHS/EHD that have been <br /> approved by the UST Cleanup Fund have been met and the evidence indicates that the site <br /> poses a low risk to the environment and to people, Upgradient Environmental recommends <br /> that PHS/EHD forward a No Further Action request to the Central Valley Board <br /> 10 <br />