Laserfiche WebLink
Orenco Systems Inc. March 2002 <br /> AdvanTex AX 10 Test Report <br /> Figure 14: Performance vs. Hydraulic Loading Rates — Davis, NSF <br /> i <br /> and Mamquam Results <br /> 30 <br /> Mamquam <br /> _ 25 <br /> 4 20 Mamquam <br /> Davis <br /> V <br /> ` 15 <br /> 10 <br /> NSF <br /> ` Davis A 20 <br /> 5 <br /> 0 <br /> 4. 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54 60 <br /> Hydraglic Loading Rale(BPtlfsgA) <br /> ■BVD TSS <br /> r <br /> A comparison of CBOD5 removal between the two tests based on CBOD5 loading rates is <br /> presented in Figure 15. The Davis unit loading was at the lower end of the range of the <br /> Mamquam unit loading but the data, nonetheless, fits well with the Mamquam data. It is <br /> noteworthy that even during the period of poor performance (Periods 4 and 5), the <br /> Mamquam unit removed as much CBOD5 mass as did the Davis unit. Also noteworthy, is <br /> that the mass of CBOD5 removed increased with increasing CBOD5 loading. <br /> Figure 15: Performance vs. CBOD Loading — Davis and Mamquam Results <br /> 450 - <br /> NOTE Nu nbers referto 0Day Period g <br /> L 400 <br /> 1 <br /> 350 <br /> 8 6 <br /> _ 300 <br /> 7 <br /> 250 <br /> dQQyO 200 3 <br /> i ffi 13 <br /> V <br /> 50 12 <br /> 100 <br /> D Ns <br /> L 50 <br /> 0 - <br /> 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 <br /> Aaera®e CDOD Loading During Period(gmw) <br /> L <br /> NovaTec Consultants Inc. Page 26 of 38 <br />