My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0013559
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
A
>
ASHLEY
>
6040
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
PA-2000129
>
SU0013559
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/27/2020 2:27:06 PM
Creation date
8/10/2020 12:14:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0013559
PE
2611
FACILITY_NAME
PA-2000129
STREET_NUMBER
6040
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
ASHLEY
STREET_TYPE
LN
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95212-
APN
08648014
ENTERED_DATE
8/4/2020 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
6040 E ASHLEY LN
RECEIVED_DATE
7/31/2020 12:00:00 AM
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
TSok
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
82
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
r <br /> and OWTS." The project is not proposing to deviate from these requirements. This continues to be the baseline for this 1 <br /> project. <br /> In addition, the Environmental Health Department's (EHD) approval EHD approval of individual wells for this subdivision <br /> is based on the following findings. As per UC Davis "Irrigation Management of Walnut Trees with a Limited Water <br /> Supply", a Walnut orchard uses 41 to 44 in. of water per acre per year. That translates out to 6,245 gallons per day for <br /> two acres. Actual average water use numbers from Community Service Area 46, a public water system operated by SJC, <br /> is 2,108 gal per day. CSA 46 is located within 5 miles of this subdivision and has an average lot size of 1.25 acres per <br /> parcel. EHD expects that this subdivision will use slightly higher numbers but in a similar range. Based on this <br /> information agricultural production would use more water than residential use. A check of the water levels of wells <br /> located in this area from the Department of Water Resources database shows the water table to be between 80 ft. to <br /> 100 ft. deep and reasonably stable over the last 20 years. Water quality testing performed by EHD on similar single use <br /> domestic wells in the area meets water quality standards for drinking water. <br /> If the proposed subdivision was not approved, the existing site would still be allowed would still retain its water rights <br /> for farming. This is also the baseline. As a result of this analysis, staff conducted the CEQA review and determined that <br /> a multiple layer of CEQA exemptions were appropriate and applicable to this project. These CEQA exemptions include <br /> Sections 15061(b)(3), 15183, and 15304. If you believe you have any other concerns, please participate in the planning <br /> commission process tomorrow tonight. The link is listed below for your convenience. Thank you, David <br /> https://www.sjgov.org/commdev/cgi-bin/cdyn.exe/file/Plannin /g PC/Upcoming%2OMeetings/AgendaJ2020-09- <br /> 03.pdf <br /> David W. Kwong,AICP <br /> Director of Community Development <br /> San Joaquin County <br /> Community Development Department <br /> (209)468-9518 <br /> Please also visit us On-line: https://www.sogov.org/commdev <br /> From: Frear Stephen Schmid <frearschmid@aol.com> <br /> Sent:Tuesday, September 1, 2020 3:04 PM <br /> To: Rutz,Jayna [PW] <irutz@slgov.org> <br /> Cc:Jolley,Jennifer [CDD] <jiolley@sigov.org>; Kwong, David [CDD] <dkwong@sigov.org>; Buchman, Fritz [PW] <br /> <fbuchman@sigov.org>; Heylin, Christopher [PW] <cheylin@sigov.org> <br /> Subject: Re: 09/03/2020 Planning Commission Hearing Agenda and PA-2000129 (SU) Staff Report- CEQA issue <br /> CAUTION:This email is originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the <br /> sender and know the content is safe. <br /> Upon further review of the original application, one of the major issues was the impact of multiple new <br /> wells. At that time, 4 years ago the developer argued that the irrigation of the then walnut orchard <br /> drew more water than the new wells would. Of course, that irrigation well has been removed, and the <br /> water has not been used for 4 years. Thus the then usage base been abandoned. In the meantime, <br /> the water situation in the area and the state in general has gotten worse and the need to monitor it <br /> has increased. I have seen nothing in the staff report, or matters I have received that addresses this <br /> crucial environmental issue. There needs to be a CEQA review of this matter. Please advise. Thank <br /> you <br /> 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.