COMPLIANCE INFO_2019 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

SAN J 0 A Q U I N Environmental Health Department CC)U :NIY Service Request Daily Time and Activity Summary from 3/24/2013 to 3/24/2050 for SR0079417 located at C-STORE W/76 FUEL ISLAND Activity Date Recorded by 02/01/2019 Deficiency letter creation, scanned the letter and ELD and compatibility guidances PE 2303 MANZO 150 min and emailed to 'Mel Higginbotham' <mhigginbotham@pmdginc.com>; Muniappa SC 031 Naidu [EH] <Mnaidu@sjcehd.com>with a request for a conference call this afternoon. The following outstanding issues were identified: "1) Permit application page 3 of 8 is missing applicant's signatures, workers compensation number, contractor's phone number, and fire district information. Page 3 of 8 of the permit application lists monitoring panel as 790091-001, TLS- 350 was identified on your drawings. Defender series overfill valve cut sheet was provided, but OPW flapper valve is listed on your permit application (page 7 of 8), correct as appropriate and resubmit. 2) The submitted ELD work plan is not acceptable for the proposed tanks, please provide a revised ELD work plan. Please refer to the State Water Resources Control Board letter dated September 14, 2018 for additional information on ELD testing requirements (attached). 3) Provide all tank and sump cut sheets, for example Xerxes installation instructions were provided in your recent submittal in lieu of cut sheets. 4) OPW flapper valve calculation sheet was provided, it appears that maybe a Defender Series flapper valve is being proposed, please clarify, submit the appropriate calculation worksheet 5) Confirm that the proposed Phil-Tite sump covers (STP and fill sumps) are VPH compliant. 6) Please point out your safety factors on the provided buoyancy calculations; one safety factor for each tank. Also page 2 of 10 of this calculation indicates that "the deadman slab shall be 36' long x3' deep x12'wide to achieve adequate weight to resist buoyancy force", please clarify if a slab of this thickness is being proposed, none was noted on the submitted plans. 7) Drawing G.0.1 (as well as several other proposed drawings) show that canopy footing will be touching or will be extremely close to the proposed fuel piping, please revise and resubmit to reflect appropriate set back distances. 8) STP sump details(G4.0 and G4.1) do not show any proposed smart sensors or vacuum communication ports or vacuum hoses. All proposed vacuum supply and communication components to be installed must be identified on proposed drawings. 9) Per your response#17 all piping cross overs will be a minimum of 12 inches, please confirm that such cross over distance will be maintained through the entire piping layout. 10) Drawing G7.1, Fe Petro leak detector is listed under VMI schedule and Phil-Tite components are listed under OPW schedule, please correct as appropriate. 11) Drawing G12.1, all vacuum zone terminations must be shown for all piping inside under dispenser containments(UDCs), identify all provisions for communication testing at each vacuum zone termination (UDCs, sumps, vent sumps, chase piping, etc.), provide a legend for any symbols (like valves) being utilized. On this drawing several vacuum hoses terminate without any apparent valves or penetrations they should be going through. Drawing G5.0 doesn't depict vacuum communication provisions for UDCs or piping. Also, it is EHD's understanding that Phill-Tite spill containers are proposed, however OPW spill containers are included on this drawing (OPW spill containers are also shown on G4.1 and several other drawings), please clarify and correct as appropriate. 12) Vacuum zone volumes were requested previously, please clarify where they Page 4 of 8