Laserfiche WebLink
Inspection Report <br /> exempt small-quantity generator (CESQG) of RCRA waste <br /> (i.e., a generator of <1000 kg of RCRA hazardous waste per <br /> month). <br /> Inspected by: Robert J. Brushia, Ph.D. <br /> Date of Inspection: December 22, 2003 <br /> Type of Inspection: CEI GME Q&M FOGUsed ' dmgted <br /> Facility Rep.: Mr. Reggie Mason, owner and operator. <br /> Type of Business: Metal manufacture and finishing operations, SIC 3471, <br /> NAICS 332813 <br /> II. CONSENT <br /> Consent to conduct inspection that involves: taking photographs, reviewing and copying <br /> records, questioning personnel and inspecting hazardous waste handling areas. <br /> Consent given by (name, title, date, & time): Mr. Reggie Mason, owner and operator, <br /> on December 22, 2003, at 0900 hours. <br /> III. DOCUMENTS REVIEWED <br /> a. Manifests, Bills of Lading, LDR's and Exception Reports: Just prior to the <br /> inspection I reviewed an LC inspection report generated by the local Certified <br /> Unified Program Agency (CUPA) on March 11 , 2003 (see attachment 2). That <br /> inspection report documented that LC violated regulatory requirements in that LC <br /> failed to maintain hazardous waste transport manifest records for 3 years as <br /> required by regulation. As a required action, the CUPA required LC to start <br /> maintaining manifest records for a minimum of 3 years. During the inspection I <br /> asked Mr. Mason if I could review manifests dating back to March 11 , 2003 to <br /> confirm that LC is retaining manifests. Mr. Mason could not locate any manifest <br /> records and stated that he must have "left them at home". I instructed LC, in <br /> writing, on page 10 of the Summary of Violations (SOV) issued on December 22, <br /> 2003 (see attachment 3), to submit copies of manifests generated since March, <br /> 2003 to DTSC. I informed Mr. Mason that failure to submit manifests as <br /> instructed in the SOV would result in a determination that LC violated regulatory <br /> requirements by not maintaining manifest records as required pursuant to <br /> California Code of Regulations, title 22, section 66262.40. <br /> b. Contingency Plan (Title 22, CCR, Section 66265.51-.52): No deficiencies <br /> observed. <br /> C. Training Plan and Records (Title 22, CCR, Section 66265.15): According to Mr. <br /> Mason, there is one employee, in addition to Mr. Mason, that is responsible for <br /> managing hazardous waste at LC. I asked Mr. Mason to provide training records <br /> to show that employee has been provided with training pursuant to California <br /> 2 <br />