My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SR0080550_SSCR
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
M
>
MOUNTAIN HOUSE
>
23577
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
SR0080550_SSCR
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/9/2020 3:26:44 PM
Creation date
11/9/2020 3:20:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
FileName_PostFix
SSCR
RECORD_ID
SR0080550
PE
2603
STREET_NUMBER
23577
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
MOUNTAIN HOUSE
STREET_TYPE
PKWY
City
TRACY
Zip
95632
APN
20908026
ENTERED_DATE
4/30/2019 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
23577 S MOUNTAIN HOUSE PKWY
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
85
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The predominate wind direction through the region is to the east-southeast. West-northwest, i <br /> or upgradient wind shed comes through the Altamont Pass and not over agricultural <br /> production land. <br /> i <br /> Although DDT was banned in 1972, its presence in San Joaquin Valley soils is an indication <br /> of its long half-life. Consequently,there may be extremely small concentrations of DDT <br /> and its degradates in the property soils from farming operations that may have taken place <br /> on the property decades ago. Any minute residual pesticide concentrations are <br /> inconsequential. <br /> §3.3 Description of all current on-site potential and/or known above ground and below ground <br /> sources of contamination identified at the project site are included in Section 3.2. No <br /> sources of current aboveground contamination were observed, other than the referenced <br /> items. <br /> Subsurface contamination of known or unknown contaminants may be possible,particularly <br /> naturally occurring nitrate concentrations, as referenced. <br /> §3.4 Description of all past off-site potential and/or known above and below ground sources of <br /> UP <br /> contamination identified in the area of the project site that could impact the site include: <br /> Information conveyed by the ERS documents indicate no listings,with an almost impossible R. <br /> likelihood of impact to the property from a distant contaminated site. The GeoTracker <br /> document illustrates no listings on the property or within a one-half mile radius from the <br /> property. There are no Leaking Underground Fuel Tanks (LUFT). <br /> Agricultural spray drift affecting the property from the nearest agricultural production land QV <br /> \couTd--Fe an extremely slight possibility, since agricultural production occurs to the <br /> northeast. Consequently,the wind would have to blow toward the southwest,which is rare. <br /> §3.5 Descriptions of all current off-site potential and/or known above and below ground sources <br /> of contamination identified in the area of the project site include those referenced in <br /> Sections 3.2, 3.3, and 3.4 above. Any contaminated sites can be considered"past" off-site <br /> sources of contamination that are simultaneously"current" contaminated sources. <br /> § 4.0 EVALUATION OF PAST AND CURRENT SOURCES OF <br /> CONTAMINATION IDENTIFIED AT OR NEAR THE SITE AND <br /> RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FURTHER ACTION <br /> §4.1 Evaluation of each potential and/or known source of contamination identified in the above <br /> Sections have been discussed in the respective Sections to facilitate the transfer of <br /> information to the reader. <br /> Chesney Consulting <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.