My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
A
>
AIRPORT
>
8010
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0542459
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/11/2021 10:35:57 AM
Creation date
11/18/2020 2:05:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0542459
PE
2965
FACILITY_ID
FA0024400
FACILITY_NAME
CAARNG STOCKTON FMS #24
STREET_NUMBER
8010
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
AIRPORT
STREET_TYPE
WAY
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95206
APN
17726004
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
8010 S AIRPORT WAY
P_LOCATION
01
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\dsedra
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
93
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Greatly appreciate the support and planning efforts. I am available to discuss over the phone tomorrow, <br /> if you want. <br /> Thanks, <br /> Donald L. Stevens, PE QSD <br /> Project Manager/Environmental Engineer <br /> Direct 916.706.3379 1 Cell 559.824.8711 <br /> dstevens(a)ecostmanage.com <br /> From: Pierce, Marcus@Waterboards [mailto:Marcus.Pierce@waterboards.ca.gov] <br /> Sent:Wednesday, April 8, 2015 10:05 AM <br /> To: Don Stevens <br /> Subject: RE: CA ARNG Stockton FMS <br /> Hi Don, <br /> I am working out of the office through next week, so email me if you need to reach me. It is likely we <br /> don't need a new work plan and the additional injections should be covered under the existing <br /> NOA. However, I need some more information to make a decision and don't have the latest monitoring <br /> report/work plan with me. Please answer the following: <br /> 1) Are you injecting at the same locations/depths as the last round? If not, explain where you plan to <br /> inject and provide a figure showing all of the planned injection points. <br /> 2) Are you injecting the amendment at the same strength as the last round?. If not, how will the <br /> amendment be modified? <br /> 3) Do any of the recent monitoring results trigger contingency plans or indicate they may be triggered in <br /> the future? <br /> 4) Are you aware of any problems that have occurred due to the previous two rounds of injections? If <br /> so, describe them. <br /> 5) When are you proposing to inject? <br /> We have a new General Order for In Situ Remediation (adopted in Feb 2015). If you are changing <br /> anything significant from the last round of injections or anticipate multiple future injection rounds, I may <br /> need to place this proposed discharge under it. <br /> Marcus <br /> From: Don Stevens [dstevens@ecostmanage.com) <br /> Sent: Wednesday, April 08, 2015 9:14 AM <br /> To: Pierce, Marcus@Waterboards <br /> Subject: CA ARNG Stockton FMS <br /> Marcus, <br /> This email is a follow up to the voicemail that I left you this morning, Wednesday April 8, 2015 regarding <br /> the CA ARNG Stockton FMS facility. Environmental Cost Management is continuing to support the CA <br /> ARNG with ISCO support services and is in the process of planning an additional round of sodium <br /> persulfate injection. During our planning process and budgeting process we have the following <br /> questions that you may be able to answer: <br /> 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.