My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0013757
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
T
>
TOKAY COLONY
>
14953
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
PA-2000107
>
SU0013757
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/25/2021 12:11:43 PM
Creation date
11/25/2020 12:02:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0013757
PE
2666
FACILITY_NAME
PA-2000107
STREET_NUMBER
14953
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
TOKAY COLONY
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95205-
APN
06508002
ENTERED_DATE
11/13/2020 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
14953 E TOKAY COLONY RD
RECEIVED_DATE
11/12/2020 12:00:00 AM
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sshih
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
PotentiallyLess Than Less Than Analyzed <br /> Significant SigniMitigation ficant with Significant No In The <br /> Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Prior EIR <br /> L AESTHETICS . <br /> Except as provided in Public Resources Code Section <br /> 21099 , would the project: <br /> a ) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista ? - <br /> b) Substantially damage scenic resources , including, <br /> but not limited to , trees, rock outcroppings, and a _ <br /> historic buildings within a state scenic highway? <br /> c) In non -urbanized areas , substantially degrade the <br /> existing visual character or quality of public views of <br /> the site and its surroundings? (Public views are <br /> those that are experienced from publically <br /> accessible vantage point) , If the project is in an <br /> urbanized area, would the project conflict with <br /> applicable zoning and other regulations governing <br /> scenic quality? <br /> d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare - <br /> which would adversely- affect day or -nighttime- views <br /> in the area? <br /> Impact Discussion : <br /> a-c) The proposed project consists of a Zone Reclassification and a Minor Subdivision . The resulting two parcels may be <br /> permitted to have a maximum of two residences each. The project site is located on a rural road in the rural area east <br /> of Lodi and is not located near any scenic resources or scenic routes . Neither the zone reclassification nor the minor <br /> subdivision will have a significant adverse effect on visual character, public views, or scenic vistas . <br /> d) The proposed project includes a Zone Reclassification from AG40 (General Agriculture, 40 acre minimum ) to AL-5 <br /> (Limited Agriculture , 5 acre minimum) . The allowed .uses on the property will remain the same . There is no development <br /> proposed with these applications that would require additional lighting . Therefore , the project is expected to have a less <br /> than significant impact from new sources of light or glare on day or nighttime views in the area . <br /> PA-2000107 (ZR) and PA-2000109 (MS )— initial Study 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.