Laserfiche WebLink
0 0 <br /> Comments: Although not known, it is likely that this was requested information provided by AGE. <br /> With only the figure to review, the reasons for and rationale for the eight proposed exploratory <br /> trenches is not known. It would have been better designated with consecutive numbers as <br /> opposed to identically named. Based on available background documents available for review, the <br /> rationale for these trenches is not known; however, based on location, may have been related to <br /> evaluating the extent of wastes at the southern property boundary area. Consistent with earlier <br /> comments, the presence or absence of wastes and waste thickness, when wastes are present, <br /> should summarize on the figure at each trench and boring location. <br /> de- <br /> ft <br /> �., <br /> The AGE email requests an office meeting for the former Pilkington `landfill post closure land use <br /> plan" and the potential for redevelopment. AGE stated that the results of the previous reports at the <br /> project have shown the "media" — waste to represent an inert waste landfill, no methane was <br /> detected and the majority of the waste is solid and a high percentage is broken glass. <br /> � -to the <br /> - 0, <br /> This email stated that AGE has prepared this PCLU plan for the site development and long term <br /> land use.AGE stated that the form is still draft and pending the findings of the easement trench <br /> investigation, requested by your office for the access road on the south side of the project.AGE <br /> stated that they planned to get the trenches ready for inspection in the next week. <br /> Comment: Typically regulatory agencies only review final (as opposed to draft)documents that are <br /> stamped and signed by the registered professionals. Also, it is not clear what is meant by the <br /> terms "form" is still draft and pending the findings.... and "get the trenches ready for inspection." <br /> �x ' U111111`111`*­__,_ <br /> '111, � w`' <br /> The LEA provided the following comments (red lettering is as was indicated in the email): <br /> • Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board <br /> The State of California is divided into nine regions, each with a separate Regional Water <br /> Quality Control Board (RWQCB) to enforce water quality regulations. The Central Valley <br /> Regional Water Quality Control Board (CVRWQCB) has been consulted by the County, the <br /> "administering agency" under the Health and Safety Code, in the development of the <br /> investigations of the site, and the approval of the plan by LEA to ensure water quality <br /> standards have been met or determine their relevance. <br /> Is this a reference to the EHD as the Solid Waste LEA? We are not the lead for the RWQCB. <br /> They are their own and we are not speaking for them. We will work beside them to address <br /> the issues at the site. <br /> I sent you an email earlier. Your report is light on trench logs and delineation information. I <br /> know that you cannot be certain how much material is on the neighboring property, but you <br /> should at least mention the depth of waste at the property line and have a discussion about <br /> the location of the waste on the neighboring parcel. <br /> Ninyo&Moore 1 500 E.Louise Avenue,Lathrop,San Joaquin County,California 1 104690095 1 August 11,2017 55 <br />