Laserfiche WebLink
Comment: There are two points made in this summary statement, one is that AGE is light on <br /> trench logs and delineation information and the other is related to wastes extending offsite <br /> onto an adjacent property. <br /> • The final deposition of the waste that was removed from the property. There should be copies <br /> of receipts from the disposal sites.All of that information should be included. <br /> • Because we do not know for sure what waste[s]are on the neighboring property, gas could be <br /> generated by that waste. 1 think that we should have at least one gas well near the waste on <br /> the neighboring property. <br /> • In the meeting with the potential buyers there was discussion of excavating the area down 5 ft <br /> and possible reuse of the material onsite. The EHD needs those details prior to considering <br /> this property partially closed. <br /> Comments: please refer to Ninyo & Moore comments related to the PCLUP. <br /> 1 <br /> The email from the LEA stated that it was decided that the LEA would need to be onsite for the <br /> planned excavation portion [of work] and that prior to excavation, a Service Request form and <br /> required and a work plan for trenching, including safety plan, and a map of proposed trench <br /> locations was required. <br /> The email provided a brief description of the anticipated earthwork construction activities that will <br /> disturb and redistribute soils and wastes during planned site development. It was indicated that <br /> the Geotechnical Investigation for the project that included general recommendations for <br /> earthwork and over-excavation of fill materials was attached to the email. Brusca Associates, Inc. <br /> stated that the Geotechnical Engineer at Raney Geotechnical, Inc., was currently considering the <br /> specific nature of the waste/landfill materials beneath the northwesterly portion of the property, <br /> and may have some additional recommendations/requirements with respect to those materials. <br /> The email stated the following information related to addressing LEA comments to the PCLUP <br /> prepared by AGE: <br /> Planned Earthwork Activities: "Project earthwork construction will involve the disturbance, <br /> redistribution, and grading of soils across esfs]sentially the entire 48-acre parcel, including the <br /> landfill area on the northwesterly portion of the site. The project specifications call for the complete <br /> excavation of loose soils1fill materials (including remnant buried glass waste) to expose underlying <br /> firm, native undisturbed soils. In some areas, the depth of required excavation to remove <br /> fills/wastes could be several feet or more. The excavated soils (and mixed-in glass materials) will <br /> be moisture conditioned as necessary, and placed and compacted as engineered fill within <br /> various project areas (potentially including areas outside of the current landfill footprint). Any <br /> deleterious materials encountered other than glass and deemed una[a]ccpetable to the <br /> Geotechnfi]cfi]al Engineer(such as piping, rubbish, large metal fragments, etc.) will likely need to <br /> d for removal and offsite disposal. Following be segregate p g earthwork construction and site <br /> Ninyo&Moore 1 500 E.Louise Avenue,Lathrop,San Joaquin County,California 1 104690095 1 August 11,2017 5 <br />