My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0013917
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
M
>
MURPHY
>
13773
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
PA-1800315
>
SU0013917
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/23/2021 1:18:23 PM
Creation date
3/4/2021 8:02:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0013917
PE
2631
FACILITY_NAME
PA-1800315
STREET_NUMBER
13773
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
MURPHY
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
ESCALON
Zip
95320-
APN
20312011
ENTERED_DATE
2/10/2021 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
13773 S MURPHY RD
RECEIVED_DATE
4/8/2021 12:00:00 AM
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\tsok
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
254
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page 2 of 6 <br /> Cost to Retrofit Existing Dairies That Do Not Have Tier 1 Or Tier 2 Lagoons <br /> Cost Estimates <br /> We have prepared a range of cost estimates for retrofitting or rebuilding dairy lagoons with new <br /> liners. See Table 1. The estimates are for four sizes of dairies within a range typically found in <br /> the Central Valley: 300 milk cows (MC), 750 MC, 1,500 MC, and 3,000 MC. For each herd size <br /> we have calculated costs for four possible scenarios. These scenarios represent the four <br /> possible combinations of the following variables: <br /> 1) Liner design: single (Tier 2) or double (Tier 1) liner; <br /> 2) Lagoon location: new location or build within the current footprint of an existing lagoon <br /> location. <br /> In order to keep the analysis consistent through the range of herd sizes, some baseline <br /> assumptions were used in sizing lagoons. These include the following: <br /> • Weather conditions found in the Tulare and Kings County area; <br /> • A 5:1 rectangular shape with a total depth of 20 feet; <br /> • A constant rate of dairy barn water generation of 50 gallons per milk cow per day; <br /> • 120 day winter storage period from November 1 to March 1 ; and, <br /> • Overall storage capacity ratio (actual/required) between 100% and 105%. <br /> Cost estimates assume a completely below ground lagoon with more than 5 feet of clearance to <br /> highest anticipated groundwater. Costs for design, earthwork, lining, and construction quality <br /> assurance and reporting are included. <br /> Option of Single or Double HDPE Liner Design <br /> The Dairy General Order stipulates that all new or modified lagoons meet the conditions <br /> described as a Tier 1 or Tier 2 lagoon. The Tier 1 lagoon is a 60-mil HDPE double liner with a <br /> leachate collection and recovery system. The Tier 2 option does not specify the liner material <br /> needed; however, it requires groundwater modeling as part of the design, and proposed <br /> ongoing monitoring that demonstrates protection of ground water. At this time, when the <br /> conditions are such that a single liner is possible, we have found it necessary to design a liner <br /> consisting of one layer of 60-mil HDPE over a one-foot thick soil layer with low permeability. <br /> Thus, for the Tier 2 case, this is what we have used as the basis of our estimate. <br /> HDPE liner material with proper care and maintenance should have a service life of 20 to 30 <br /> years. We have not calculated a life cycle cost, but simply a single installation cost. Dairy <br /> facilities can have a useful life that exceeds the liner life, and thus a liner may need to be <br /> reinstalled at least once over the useful life of a dairy. <br /> Option of New Location or Existing Location <br /> The existing location option assumes that the size of the current lagoon is adequate, requiring <br /> only the excavation of several feet of organic laden soil, and contouring of the side slopes. An <br /> existing location requires the removal of liquid and solid manure prior to any construction work. <br /> Costs were included for that effort. <br /> The new location option includes estimates for full excavation (assuming stockpiling nearby) <br /> and a location within close proximity in order to connect to the existing wastewater system. <br /> Here, the cleanout of manure from the old lagoon could be performed at any time but will at <br /> some point need to be performed to close the lagoon. If the old lagoon was allowed to dry, the <br /> cleanout costs could be reduced by handling the manure in a dry state. So we have included <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.