Laserfiche WebLink
Page 3 of 6 <br /> Cost to Retrofit Existing Dairies That Do Not Have Tier 1 Or Tier 2 Lagoons <br /> the "liquid and wet solid" cleanout cost in parentheses in Table 1 to provide an understanding of <br /> the range of costs that could be expected to clean the old lagoon to close the project. <br /> Table 1. Costs to retrofit lagoons based on dairy size and retrofit type. <br /> Existing Location* New Location Wet Cleanout** <br /> 300 MC, 2.1 ac lagoon <br /> Single $198,000 $180,000 (+$37,000) <br /> Double $270,000 $252,000 (+$37,000) <br /> 750 MC, 3.4 ac lagoon <br /> Single $300,000 $275,000 (+$78,000) <br /> Double $425,000 $399,000 (+$78,000) <br /> 1,500 MC, 6.0 ac lagoon <br /> Single $521,000 $482,000 (+$171,000) <br /> Double $753,000 $714,000 (+$171,000) <br /> 3,000 MC, 10.7 ac lagoon <br /> Single $948,000 $887,000 (+$357,000) <br /> Double $1,383,000 $1,321,000 (+$357,000) <br /> An existing location estimate includes the cleanout of liquid and solid manure from the lagoon before <br /> construction can begin. <br /> A new location estimate does not include any cleanout cost of the old lagoon. This wet cleanout cost <br /> could be expected if performed while water is in the old lagoon. <br /> Issues <br /> There are many issues that may arise with the retrofitting or replacement of a lagoon. Each <br /> dairy has a different set of circumstances that may require additional effort to be expended in <br /> locating and designing a lagoon. <br /> Tier I Lagoon (Double Liner) vs. Tier 2 Lagoon (Single Liner) <br /> From the estimated costs shown in Table 1, a single liner appears to be a more cost-effective <br /> option. However, to obtain approval for a single liner, the design must show that groundwater <br /> will not be impacted via a model, and a monitoring system must be installed and maintained. <br /> Groundwater models that are currently used to predict the performance of a liner are simplified <br /> models that are highly conservative. Conditions contributing to passing the modeling are low <br /> nitrate levels in background groundwater samples, high velocity groundwater flow beneath the <br /> site, low permeability soils, and minimal defects in the post-construction liner. <br /> Currently, we are finding that most sites do not pass the simplified model and a single liner is <br /> thus not an eligible option. If a detailed modeling effort were performed, the modeling cost <br /> could equal the cost of the extra liner layer in question, without a guarantee of positive results. <br /> Thus, detailed modeling is generally not pursued at this time. <br /> A single liner requires some type of accompanying groundwater monitoring, as noted above. <br /> Monitoring wells focused around the subject lagoon (outside of the representative monitoring <br /> program) are the typical monitoring system proposed. When depth to first encountered water is <br />