Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Soil Investigations for Data Collection in the Delta <br />Initial Study/Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration 87 <br />size of fry migrants at approximately 40 millimeters between December and April <br />in Mill, Butte, and Deer Creeks reflects a prolonged emergence of fry from the <br />gravel (Lindley et al. 2004). Studies in Butte Creek found that the majority of CV <br />spring-run Chinook salmon migrants are fry occurring primarily during December, <br />January, and February, and that fry movements appeared to be influenced by <br />flow (Ward et al. 2002, 2003; McReynolds et al. 2005). Small numbers of CV <br />spring-run Chinook salmon remained in Butte Creek to rear and migrated as <br />yearlings later in the spring. Juvenile emigration patterns in Mill and Deer Creeks <br />are very similar to patterns observed in Butte Creek, with the exception that <br />juveniles from Mill and Deer creeks typically exhibit a later young-of-the-year <br />migration and an earlier yearling migration (Lindley et al. 2006). Peak movement <br />of yearling CV spring-run Chinook salmon in the Sacramento River at Knights <br />Landing occurs in December, and is high in January, tapering off through the <br />middle of February; however, juveniles were also observed between November <br />and the end of February (Snider and Titus 2000). <br />Overall, designated in-water work windows would reduce exposure of sensitive <br />fish species, including Chinook salmon, and life stages to in-water work activities. <br />The activities of the Proposed Project would be minor in scope and would not <br />result in degradation of aquatic habitat or water quality conditions and any <br />potential effects related to potential increase in suspended sediment <br />concentrations and contaminants due to disturbance of the river bed would be <br />negligible. Implementation of Mitigation Measures MM BIO-14, along with MM <br />HYD-1 and MM HAZ-1 through 4 would reduce potential impacts to CV spring- <br />run Chinook salmon to: Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated. <br />Sacramento River winter-run ESU of Chinook Salmon (Oncorhynchus <br />tshawytscha) <br />The Sacramento River winter-run Chinook salmon ESU was initially listed as a <br />threatened species in August 1989, under emergency provisions of the federal <br />Endangered Species Act (FESA) (NMFS 1989) and was listed as threatened in a <br />final rule in November 1990 (NMFS 1990). The ESU consists of only one <br />population confined to the mainstem of the upper Sacramento River in <br />California’s Central Valley below Keswick Dam. The ESU was reclassified as <br />endangered under the FESA on January 4, 1994 (NMFS 1994), because of <br />increased variability of run sizes, expected weak returns as a result of two small <br />year classes in 1991 and 1993, and a 99% decline between 1966 and 1991. The <br />National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) reaffirmed the listing of the <br />Sacramento River winter-run Chinook salmon ESU as endangered on June 28, <br />2005 (NMFS 2005c) and included winter-run Chinook salmon in the Livingston <br />Stone National Fish Hatchery artificial propagation program in the ESU. In <br />addition to the federal listing, Sacramento River winter-run Chinook salmon are <br />listed as endangered under the CESA. <br />Sacramento River winter-run Chinook salmon adults enter the Sacramento River <br />basin between December and July; the peak occurs in March (Yoshiyama et al.