My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CO0052918
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
W
>
WALNUT GROVE
>
0
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
CO0052918
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2022 10:51:25 AM
Creation date
3/5/2021 10:16:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
RECORD_ID
CO0052918
PE
2900
STREET_NUMBER
0
STREET_NAME
WALNUT GROVE
City
WALNUT GROVE
ENTERED_DATE
11/4/2020 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
WALNUT GROVE & OTHERS
RECEIVED_DATE
11/4/2020 12:00:00 AM
P_LOCATION
99
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\ymoreno
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
343
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Soil Investigations for Data Collection in the Delta <br />Initial Study/Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration 88 <br />1998, Moyle 2002). Because winter-run Chinook salmon use only the <br />Sacramento River system for spawning, adults are likely to migrate upstream <br />primarily along the western edge of the Delta through the Sacramento River <br />corridor. Their migration past RBDD at river mile 242 begins in mid-December <br />and continues into early August. The majority of the run passes RBDD between <br />January and May, with the peak in mid-March (Hallock and Fisher 1985). The <br />timing of migration may vary somewhat due to changes in river flows, dam <br />operations, and water year type (Yoshiyama et al. 1998, Moyle 2002). <br />Sacramento River winter-run Chinook salmon migrate into freshwater while still <br />being immature and delay spawning for weeks or months upon reaching their <br />spawning grounds (Healey 1991). <br />Emigrating juvenile winter-run Chinook salmon pass the Red Bluff Diversion Dam <br />beginning as early as mid-July, typically peaking in September, and can continue <br />through March in dry years (Vogel and Marine 1991; NMFS 1997). Many <br />juveniles apparently rear in the Sacramento River below Red Bluff Diversion <br />Dam for several months before they reach the Delta (Williams 2006). From 1995 <br />to 1999, all winter-run Chinook salmon outmigrating as fry passed the Red Bluff <br />Diversion Dam by October, and all outmigrating presmolts and smolts passed the <br />Red Bluff Diversion Dam by March (Martin et al. 2001). Juvenile winter-run <br />Chinook salmon are present in the Delta primarily from November through early <br />May based on data collected from trawls in the Sacramento River at West <br />Sacramento (river mile 55) (USFWS 2006b), although the overall timing may <br />extend from September to early May (NMFS 2012). The timing of migration <br />varies somewhat because of changes in river flows, dam operations, seasonal <br />water temperatures, and hydrologic conditions (water year type). <br />Overall, designated in-water work windows would reduce exposure of sensitive <br />fish species, including Sacramento River winter-run Chinook Salmon ESU and <br />life stages to in-water work activities. The activities of the Proposed Project would <br />be minor in scope and would not result in degradation of aquatic habitat or water <br />quality conditions and any potential effects related to potential increase in <br />suspended sediment concentrations and contaminants due to disturbance of the <br />river bed would be negligible. Implementation of Mitigation Measures MM BIO- <br />14, along with MM HYD-1 and MM HAZ-1 through 4 would reduce potential <br />impacts to Sacramento River winter-run Chinook salmon to: Less than Significant <br />with Mitigation Incorporated. <br />Sacramento Splittail (Pogonicthys macrolepidotus) <br />The Sacramento splittail was listed as threatened under the federal Endangered <br />Species Act (FESA) on February 8, 1999 (NMFS 1999). This ruling was <br />challenged by two lawsuits (San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority v. Anne <br />Badgley et al. and State Water Contractors et al. v. Michael Spear et al.). On <br />June 23, 2000, the Federal Eastern District Court of California found the ruling to <br />be unlawful and on September 22 of the same year remanded the determination <br />back to the U.S Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) for re-evaluation of their
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.