My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CO0052918
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
W
>
WALNUT GROVE
>
0
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
CO0052918
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2022 10:51:25 AM
Creation date
3/5/2021 10:16:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
RECORD_ID
CO0052918
PE
2900
STREET_NUMBER
0
STREET_NAME
WALNUT GROVE
City
WALNUT GROVE
ENTERED_DATE
11/4/2020 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
WALNUT GROVE & OTHERS
RECEIVED_DATE
11/4/2020 12:00:00 AM
P_LOCATION
99
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\ymoreno
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
343
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Soil Investigations for Data Collection in the Delta <br />Initial Study/Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration 89 <br />original listing decision. Upon further evaluation, splittail was removed from the <br />FESA on September 22, 2003 (USFWS 2003). On August 13, 2009, the Center <br />for Biological Diversity (2009) challenged the 2003 decision to remove splittail <br />from the FESA. However, on October 7, 2010, the USFWS found that listing of <br />splittail was not warranted (USFWS 2010b). The splittail is designated as a <br />species of special concern by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife <br />(CDFW ). <br />Mature splittail begin a gradual upstream migration towards spawning areas <br />sometime between late November and late January, with larger splittail migrating <br />earlier (Caywood 1974; Moyle et al. 2004). The relationship between migrations <br />and river flows is poorly understood, but it is likely that splittail have a positive <br />behavioral response to increases in flows and turbidity. Feeding in flooded <br />riparian areas in the weeks just prior to spawning may be important for later <br />spawning success and for postspawning survival. Not all splittail make significant <br />movements prior to spawning, as indicated by evidence of spawning in Suisun <br />Marsh (Meng and Matern 2001) and the Petaluma River. <br />The upstream movement of splittail is closely linked with flow events from <br />February to April that inundate floodplains and riparian areas (Garman and <br />Baxter 1999; Harrell and Sommer 2003). Seasonal inundation of shallow <br />floodplains provides both spawning and foraging habitat for splittail (Caywood <br />1974; Daniels and Moyle 1983; Baxter et al. 1996; Sommer et al. 1997). <br />Evidence of splittail spawning on floodplains has been found on both the San <br />Joaquin and Sacramento Rivers. In the San Joaquin River drainage, spawning <br />has apparently taken place in wet years in the region where the San Joaquin <br />River is joined by the Tuolumne and Merced Rivers (Moyle et al. 2004). In the <br />Plan Area, splittail spawn on inundated floodplains in the Yolo and Sutter <br />Bypasses, which are extensively flooded in wet years, and along the Cosumnes <br />River area from February to July (Sommer et al. 1997, 2001, 2002; Crain et al. <br />2004; Moyle et al. 2004). When floodplain inundation does not occur in the Yolo <br />or Sutter Bypasses, adult splittail migrate farther upstream to suitable habitat <br />along channel margins or flood terraces; spawning in such locations occurs in all <br />water year types (Feyrer et al. 2005). Although spawning is typically greatest in <br />wet years, CDFW surveys demonstrate spawning takes place every year along <br />the river edges and backwaters created by small increases in flow. In the eastern <br />Delta, the floodplain along the lower Cosumnes River appears to be important as <br />spawning habitat. Ripe splittail have been observed in areas flooded by levee <br />breaches, turbid water, and flooded terrestrial vegetation. <br />Overall, designated in-water work windows would reduce exposure of sensitive <br />fish species, including Sacramento splittail, and life stages to in-water work <br />activities. The activities of the Proposed Project would be minor in scope and <br />would not result in degradation of aquatic habitat or water quality conditions and <br />any potential effects related to potential increase in suspended sediment <br />concentrations and contaminants due to disturbance of the river bed would be <br />negligible. Implementation of Mitigation Measures MM BIO-14, along with MM
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.