My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0014056
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
P
>
POCK
>
3009
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
PA-2100031
>
SU0014056
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/21/2022 9:36:37 AM
Creation date
4/7/2021 2:18:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0014056
PE
2666
FACILITY_NAME
PA-2100031
STREET_NUMBER
3009
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
POCK
STREET_TYPE
LN
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95205-
APN
17912011, -13, -14
ENTERED_DATE
4/7/2021 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
3009 S POCK LN
RECEIVED_DATE
7/6/2022 12:00:00 AM
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\lsauers
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1803
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
TABLE 3-2 <br /> SJVAPCD SIGNIFICANCE THRESHOLDS AND <br /> PROJECT AIR POLLUTANT EMISSIONS <br /> ROG NO. CO SOX PM10 PM2.5 <br /> Significance Thresholds(tons/year)' 10 10 100 27 15 15 <br /> Construction Emissions (tons/year)2 1.25 1.98 2.12 <0.01 0.15 0.09 <br /> Exceeds threshold? No No No No No No <br /> With Rule 9510 application 1.58 0.10 <br /> Operational Emissions(tons/year)' 2.48 1.73 9.82 0.02 2.11 0.60 <br /> Exceeds threshold? No No No No No No <br /> With Rule 9510 application 1.15 1.05 <br /> 'Applies to both construction and operational emissions. <br /> Z Maximum emissions in a calendar year. <br /> 3 Annual emissions. <br /> Sources: CaIEEMod Version 2020.4.0,SJVAPCD 2015. <br /> As indicated in Table 3-2, both project construction and operational emissions would be <br /> substantially below the significance thresholds established by SJVAPCD for criteria <br /> pollutant emissions. As the significance thresholds were established in part to ensure <br /> consistency with the objectives of air quality attainment plans adopted by the SJVAPCD, <br /> project emissions would be consistent with these plans. <br /> While project emissions would not be significant, the project would still be required to <br /> comply with applicable SJVAPCD rules and regulations, which would further reduce <br /> potential air quality impacts. As noted, SJVAPCD Regulation VIII contains measures to <br /> reduce fugitive dust emissions during construction. Dust control provisions are also <br /> routinely included in site improvement plans and specifications, along with construction <br /> contracts. <br /> In addition, the NOx and PMlo construction and operational emission reduction <br /> requirements of SJVAPCD Rule 9510 would apply. Table 3-2 shows the estimated <br /> emissions that would result from compliance with Rule 9510 requirements. Under Rule <br /> 9510, an Air Impact Assessment application detailing how the required reductions would <br /> be achieved shall be submitted by the project applicant no later than applying for a final <br /> discretionary approval with the County. Compliance with Rule 9510 and dust control <br /> requirements would further reduce project impacts related to air quality plans that are <br /> already less than significant. <br /> b) Cumulative Emissions. <br /> As noted in a) above, project operational emissions would not exceed SJVAPCD <br /> significance thresholds. Future attainment of federal and State ambient air quality <br /> standards is a function of successful implementation of the SJVAPCD's attainment plans. <br /> Consequently, the application of significance thresholds for criteria pollutants is relevant <br /> Pock Lane Public Review Draft IS/MND 3-10 May 2022 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.