CORRESPONDENCE_2000-2003 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

t exceed an hourly average of 45 dBa during the nighttime or 55 dBa during the daytime, then setbacks and a limitation on hours of operations shall be mandatory. As recommended in the Forward, Inc. Landfill Use Permit Modifications, the option of a soundwall at 9690 Austin Road shall be available to the resident. (PUBLIC-HEALTH-AND SAFEM (7) 36(E.5) Identified in EIR: The landfill operator shall submit an updated post-closure permit application for WMU-A that presents plans to prohibit the expansion of the new landfill areas above WMU-A. The applicant filed a renewal of its hazardous waste permit for U-A on October 31, 2000 (Kleinfelder, 2000)that presents the controls and monitoring of WMU-A. The applicant's JTD describes creating a wedge of landfill material north of U-A that would keep a buffer area around the WMU-A boundaries clear of new refuse and then start to build outward and upward. This plan must have the approval of the CNWB and RWQCB. (BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES) (8) 61 (H.2) Identified in EIR: Night lighting with sodium lamps with sharp cutoff angles shall be used to focus light in active landfill areas(target areas) and to avoid nighttime lighting of adjacent open areas and trees. (9) 66 Austin 1994(F2.a)(similar),Austin 2000(F2.a) Under current project plans, 31 of the 32 valley oaks are along the perimeter of the site or are in the designated wildlife preserve adjacent to the creek and would not be removed. (10)67 Austin 1994(F2.b)(similar),Austin 2000(F2.b) Prior to initiation of any activity within a 100-foot radius of a valley oak proposed for retention, the project proponent shall install clearly visible temporary fencing around the dripline of the Valley oak to prevent inadvertent damage during on-sate acdvide& Fencing shall be removed upon completion of activity within the oak's vicinity. Site ers shall be advised of the sensitivity of on-site oaks to disturbance. (11)68 Austin 1994(F2.c)(similar),Austin 2000(F2.c) Where avoidance of a valley oak(s)as specified above fined infeasible, the project proponent shall replace each oak as required by the s Natural Resources Regulations:three oaks shall be planted in appropriate ins for each oak removed. Replacement trees shall be the same species as the removed trees. Replacement trees shall be planted on the site in association with the WWand Mitigation and Monitoring Plan described above. (12) 69 Austin 1994(F2.a)(similar),Austin 2000(F2.d) To ensure the success of mitigation,planted and ret ' trees shall be monitored for a period of five years following initial disturbance within Me vicinity of a retained tree or following planting of a replacement tree. If, during the course of monitoring, a significant decline in the health of planted or retained trees is kleniffied by a qualified arborist, the tree shall be replaced as described above. (13) 70 Austin 1994(F3.a)(similar),Austin 2000(similar) (F3.a) Of the 219 acres disturbed, a 10.5—acre wildlife preserve and floodplain will be retained as foraging habitat. San Joaquin County UP-00-7, ER-00-21Forward, Inc. Community Development Page 3