My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CORRESPONDENCE_2012
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
C
>
CORRAL HOLLOW
>
31130
>
4400 - Solid Waste Program
>
PR0440003
>
CORRESPONDENCE_2012
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/27/2021 2:42:13 PM
Creation date
4/21/2021 2:55:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
4400 - Solid Waste Program
File Section
CORRESPONDENCE
FileName_PostFix
2012
RECORD_ID
PR0440003
PE
4434
FACILITY_ID
FA0003698
FACILITY_NAME
CORRAL HOLLOW LANDFILL
STREET_NUMBER
31130
STREET_NAME
CORRAL HOLLOW
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
TRACY
Zip
95376
APN
25303010
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
31130 CORRAL HOLLOW RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\cfield
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\SW\SW_4434_PR0440003_31130 CORRAL HOLLOW_2012.tif
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
269
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
0 0 W J� <br /> Mr. Michael Carroll - 2 - 10 May 2012 <br /> Corral Hollow Sanitary Landfill <br /> 2. Hydrologic Report: The hydrologic report (hereafter"Hydro Report") states that a landfill <br /> v-ditch collects and drains precipitation from approximately 16.98 acres. The peak calculated <br /> flow volume in the landfill v-ditch from a 24-hour 100-year storm event is 23.34 cubic feet per <br /> second (cfs). The Discharger proposes that this landfill v-ditch be lined with erosion <br /> control blanket prior to hydroseeding. The specification for the North American Green C125 <br /> Erosion Control Blanket states that it has a functional longevity of 36 months (3 years). On the <br /> other hand the Hydro Report states that a Caltrans v-ditch drains approximately 4.33 acres and <br /> has a peak calculated flow volume of 8.42 CFS during a 24-hour 100-year storm event. Yet, the <br /> Caltrans v-ditch which has less peak flow volume is a concrete lined v-ditch. Also, the Caltrans <br /> v-ditch drains 1/4 of the area of the landfill v-ditch (4.33 acres versus 16.98 acres) yet has 1/3 <br /> the runoff(8.42 cfs versus 23.34 cfs). It is unclear if the software program determined that more <br /> precipitation would percolate into the ground at the previously covered landfill area than in the <br /> Caltrans area, thus reducing the flow volume in the landfill v-ditch. Another major concern is that <br /> the landfill v-ditch which conveys higher precipitation flows than the Caltrans v-ditch yet is lined <br /> with a less permanent erosion resistant material will have a constant erosion <br /> control maintenance issue in preventing rills and gullet's from forming in the landfill v-ditch <br /> during the life of the project. <br /> 3. Drawings-Sheet 6 Detail#4: Detail#4 shows that the Geocomposite Drainage Layer Will be <br /> extended to contact the existing 1 foot barrier soil. This configuration provides a leakage path. <br /> An alternative method that might be considered is shown in the attached markup drawing. The <br /> Geocomposite Drainage Layer extension is replaced with LLDPE Liner underneath the drainage <br /> layer. Secondly, the barrier soil is extended over the LLDPE Liner to form an overlapping joint. <br /> 4. Construction Quality Assurance Plan Sections 5.1 & 5.2: The conformance testing for the <br /> Geocomposite Drainage Layer (5.1) and Linear-Low Density Polyethylene (LLDPE) <br /> Geomembrane calls for"minimum of one test per 100,000 square feet installed'. The total <br /> installed area is less than 2 acres (87,120 sq ft). It is unclear if the Discharger plans to only take <br /> one sample of each material for conformance testing? For less than 100,000 sq ft of total <br /> installed area (small project) it is recommended that the Discharger take more than one sample <br /> for comparison of the results. It is our understanding that the manufacturer's recommendation of <br /> one sample per 100,000 square feet is based on their assumption that most projects are <br /> ,typically larger than 2 acres at landfills. <br /> 5. Shell Oil Pipeline Access: The previous design had provisions to place barrier panels such <br /> that the panels could be readily removed to access the Shell pipeline. It is not clear if this design <br /> feature has been deleted in order to maintain continuity and strength of the LLDPE Liner. It is <br /> not clear what arrangements have been made with the owners of the Shell pipeline to provide <br /> access/maintenance of the pipeline and how this would affect the performance of the landfill <br /> cover extension project. <br /> 6. Conformance with Manufacturer's recommended site preparation and installation <br /> procedures: Board Staff has not verified that the site preparation and installation procedures in <br /> the Discharger's specifications conform to the liner manufacturer's installation specifications. <br /> Board Staff has relied on the Discharger/Consultant's professional responsibility to translate the <br /> manufacturer's specifications concisely and completely into the Discharger's design and <br /> construction quality assurance specifications. Any deviations from the manufacturer's <br /> installation specifications should be immediately brought to Board Staffs attention in an <br /> accompanying letter. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.