My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_REMEDIAL ACTION DOCUMENT
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
W
>
WILLOW GLEN
>
13751
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0009025
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_REMEDIAL ACTION DOCUMENT
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/19/2021 2:55:48 PM
Creation date
5/19/2021 12:15:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
REMEDIAL ACTION DOCUMENT
RECORD_ID
PR0009025
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0004055
FACILITY_NAME
LATHROP GAS DEHYDRATOR
STREET_NUMBER
13751
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
WILLOW GLEN
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95206
APN
19105010
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
13751 S WILLOW GLEN RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
003
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\dsedra
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
282
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
REMEDIATION COMPLETION REPORT-LATHROP DEHYDRATOR STATION 3.0 FIELD ACTIVITIES <br /> • Benzene,toluene,ethylbenzene,and total xylenes were non-detect in all 24 final <br /> verification samples. <br /> • TPH-g and TPH-mo were also non-detect in all 24 final verification samples. <br /> • TPH-d was non-detect in 13 of the 24 verification samples.TPH-d was above the <br /> preliminary cleanup goal of 100 mg/kg in six of the 24 samples,with the highest <br /> concentration of 1,000 mg/kg in sample 90SW8-9.This side wall sample was an off-site <br /> location, taken at 9 feet bgs near the southeastern corner of the excavation).Samples <br /> 90SW18-8,90SW17-10,and 90SW13-9 (collected within approximately 15 feet on either <br /> side of sample 90SW8-9) contained TPH-d at concentrations of non-detect,530 mg/kg, <br /> and 92 mg/kg,respectively. <br /> 3.7 Backfilling <br /> The excavation was backfilled by placing three-quarter-inch subrounded drain rock from <br /> the base of the excavation(13 feet bgs)to approximately 6 feet bgs.A woven geotextile <br /> fabric was then placed over the drain rock.Class II aggregate base rock fill was placed in <br /> loose uncompacted 12-inch lifts and compacted to achieve a minimum 95 percent relative <br /> compaction per American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) standard ASTM D1557 <br /> (ASTM 1997). <br /> Two truck loads of bedding sand were brought in to place around the approximate 30 feet <br /> of exposed active gas lines. Backfilling continued with the Class 11 aggregate base to restore <br /> original site grades. <br /> The eastern portion of the excavation (east of the fenceline) was backfilled with three- <br /> quarter-inch drain rock from approximately 10 feet bgs to 3 feet bgs.Previously stockpiled <br /> agricultural soil was then placed from 3 feet bgs to the original grade. <br /> The results of the compaction testing are included in Appendix E. The top 3 feet of the <br /> eastern portion of the excavation where native soil was replaced was rolled and not tested <br /> because this area is outside the station and is for farmland use. <br /> 3.8 Final Site Grading and Restoration <br /> The station pad was restored by scraping/blading the ground surface with a loader scraper <br /> to create a nominal slope to the south to facilitate drainage toward the road drainage ditch. <br /> Three-quarter-inch surface drain rock was then placed across the Site to match existing <br /> station grades. Agricultural material was placed with a skip loader to match existing grades <br /> to the east of the fenceline. <br /> New permanent fencing and entry gate were installed to replace sections that were removed <br /> for construction activities. Figure 4 illustrates the final condition of the Site. Representatives <br /> of San Joaquin County inspected the Site,approved the final restoration and approved <br /> completion of the grading permit. Photographs of the Site construction activities are <br /> provided in Appendix B. <br /> SFOILATHROPCOMPLETIONREPORT 12-1-04.DOC 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.