Laserfiche WebLink
Nl dv 1N3vjtAO'8 <br /> Monitoring Report Compliance Chist tiQ®z 2jdW 4 <br /> Discharges Regulated by Title 27 and/or Part 258 <br /> Reference Parameter a� es No N/A Reviewer Comment <br /> WDRs u. Is there a summary of the monitoring x See comment. <br /> Standard results indicating any changes made <br /> Provisions or observed since the previous annual <br /> (1993,1997,2000) report? <br /> v. Is there an evaluation of the <br /> effectiveness of the leachate <br /> monitoring/control facilities? <br /> Standard w. Is there a discussion about the <br /> Provisions annual LCRS testing and a <br /> (April 2000) comparison to earlier testing9 <br /> or check WDRs <br /> Violations Noted? (check one) Yes No x <br /> If Yes, check all issues that apply and provide comments: <br /> Incomplete transmittal letter Comments (to be entered into SWIM): <br /> Incomplete report <br /> Inadequate monitoring program <br /> New release <br /> Inadequate response to evidence of a release <br /> WDRs violation other than listed above <br /> Other(explain in comments) <br /> Additional Comments and Recommendations: <br /> Comment 2.u.=MW-2 may be impacted due to increase in chloride. MW-1,upgradient well, also had increase in <br /> chloride. Chloride level in MW-2 lower than WQPS in WDRs. May be due to natural variation in ground water <br /> quality across the site. Decreasing levels of pH and increasing concentrations of bicarbonate in MW-1,upgradient <br /> well. MW-4 continues to have increasing concentrations of chloride and nitrate. Probably from wastewater <br /> upgradient from MW-4. Report references November 2002 report,but does not specifically reference which <br /> November 2002 report. County should clarify in subsequent reports. Include any water quality from adjacent ponds. <br /> The Table(no table number)on page 9 shows NE(2)or NE(1)under the Conc.Limit column of several analytes due <br /> to statistical results. When this occurs,the Table should also include the latest calculated Conc.Limit so there is a <br /> value for comparison. The County should reflect this change in subsequent reports. <br /> �j <br /> RWQCB Staff Signature: <br /> Date: �' <br />