Laserfiche WebLink
Ceological Technics Inc. Page 7 <br /> 35SQOelty Road, Vernalis,CA <br /> Report-Preliminary Environmental Site Assessment <br /> Project No. 248? <br /> February 6, 1995 <br /> 3.1 Soil Boring Installation <br /> On f anuary 20, 1995 Geological Technics Inc. and well drillers Osterberg and <br /> Stewart Inc. mobilized drilling equipment to the site. Only two boring <br /> locations were able to be accessed due to very wet field conditions caused by <br /> the recent and heavy rains. Hollow stem auger drilling methods with wire <br /> line coring equipment were utilized for this investigation. Two soil borings, <br /> SB-1 and SB-2, were advanced to an approximate depth of 35 feet below <br /> ground surface (Figure 2). <br /> During drilling, soil samples were collected for geological and analytical <br /> evaluation at 5 foot intervals starting at five feet: below ground surface to the <br /> total depth of 35 feet. Soil samples for laboratory analyses were collected in <br /> brass liners using a 2.5 inch modified California split spoon sampler. All soil <br /> samples were sealed with aluminum foil, capped, labeled and placed in a <br /> cooler at 4° Celsius for transport to the laboratory following Chain of Custody <br /> protocol. An attempt was made to obtain a grab water sample from SB-2 by <br /> inserting a disposable bailer into the hollow stem of the auger. The bailer was <br /> unable to recover any fluid, however it came back coated with a dark oily <br /> substance. A wipe sample of this substance was collected from the bailer. <br /> 3.2 Field Screening Methods <br /> Because every soil sample collected was not submitted for laboratory analysis, <br /> a screening process was, used to gather additional information through field <br /> observation. The brass sleeve containing soil next to the sample recovered <br /> for possible laboratory analyses was screened. This screening process <br /> particularly observed sediment type, especially grain size and clay content, <br /> moisture content, visible evidence of contamination, i.e., color change due to <br /> reduction of iron or discoloration from hydrocarbons and other pollutants, <br /> and the readings alcove background on a organic vapor meter (OW). The <br /> OVM is a field portable photo ionization detector that uses a 10.2 eV lamp to <br /> detect compounds with ionization potential below 10.2 eV (hydrocarbon <br /> range). <br /> In SB-1 no reading above background (background = 0-1 ppm) was observed <br /> in the screened samples. However, in SB-2 elevated readings were observed <br /> that ranged from 0 to 172 parts per million (volume to volume concentration <br /> of compounds ionizable at 10.2 eV). <br />