My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FIELD DOCUMENTS
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
W
>
WELTY
>
35500
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0508043
>
FIELD DOCUMENTS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/27/2021 2:02:02 AM
Creation date
5/24/2021 4:13:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
FIELD DOCUMENTS
RECORD_ID
PR0508043
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0007905
FACILITY_NAME
CHEVRON PIPELINES
STREET_NUMBER
35500
STREET_NAME
WELTY
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
VERNALIS
Zip
95385
APN
25526003
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
35500 WELTY RD
P_LOCATION
99
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\dsedra
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2959
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Data Usability Summary Page 2 of 3 <br /> A summary of qualified data is provided in Table B-1. Data validation reason codes for all qualified data <br /> with the associated reasons for qualification are also presented and defined on Table B-1. <br /> Precision and Accuracy <br /> The precision and accuracy of field and laboratory QC samples were evaluated. The relative percent <br /> differences(RPDs)for laboratory control sample samples/laboratory control sample duplicates <br /> (LCS/LCSDs)provided information on the precision of the analytical procedures. Evaluation of the <br /> percent recoveries(%Rs) of LCS/LCSDs,and surrogates provided information on accuracy. Project- <br /> specific matrix spike/matrix spike duplicate(MS/MSD) samples were collected for this data set. All <br /> LCS/LCSD%Rs,LCS/LCSD RPDs, and surrogate%Rs were within the required laboratory control <br /> limits. <br /> Representativeness <br /> Representativeness was assessed through the evaluation of method blank samples, equipment rinsate <br /> blank sample, chain-of-custody forms,preservation, and holding times. <br /> Field Duplicate Samples <br /> Field duplicate pairs were not collected with this data set. <br /> Method Blank Results <br /> All laboratory method blanks were free of contamination. <br /> Chain-Of-Custody Forms <br /> Sample analytical results were evaluated for agreement with the chain-of-custody form. Based on the <br /> evaluation, all samples were received at the laboratory in the appropriate containers and in good condition <br /> with the chain-of-custody form filled out properly. <br /> Preservation and Holding Times <br /> Samples were preserved in the field as appropriate,were received at the laboratory within the acceptance <br /> temperature criterion of 4+2 °C,and were prepared and analyzed within specified holding times. The <br /> sample preservations,when required by the analysis,were less than the acceptance pH limit of 2. <br /> Reporting Limits <br /> Data reported for this sampling event were reported with the laboratory MDLs. The MDL represents the <br /> lowest concentration point where an analyte can be positively identified,but the quantitation is an <br /> estimate. The LOQ is the lowest concentration of an analyte in a sample that the laboratory can report <br /> with precision and accuracy. Analytes that were reported between the MDL and LOQ for this data set <br /> were qualified J as estimates. <br /> Laboratory Fuel Notes for TPHd Analysis <br /> The laboratory noted that the observed hydrocarbon fuel pattern for TPHd analysis in sample WFSMW-1- <br /> W-070430 was#2 fuel/diesel and an additional pattern that elutes later in the target carbon range. The <br /> samples were also silica-gel cleaned prior to the analysis and TPHd were not detected after the silica-gel <br /> cleanup. This indicates the TPHd results were likely biased high due to biogenic material that was <br /> removed during silica-gel analysis. <br /> Completeness <br /> Completeness is defined as the number of valid results(i.e.,those not rejected)divided by the total <br /> number rejected. Based on this evaluation of the data against the QC objectives,the percentages of valid <br /> data for each method and matrix are 100 percent. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.