Laserfiche WebLink
Hunter Container Corporation <br /> 35275 Hiq. 33, Vernalis, California April 23, 1996 <br /> Phase I-Site Characterization (WastelBurn Pit) Page: 2 <br /> contamination (Figure 2). Contamination was identified and confirmed in all four (4) of the <br /> hand borings. <br /> Concentrations ofEthylbenzene and Trichloroethylene (TCE)were detected in sample BB-3 at <br /> varying depths of four (4), six (6), eight (8) and ten (10) feet b.g.l. Samples from BB-4 had <br /> detectable concentrations of Ethylbenzene and TCE at eight (8) feet b.g.l. and Benzene, <br /> Toluene, and Xylene at eight (8) and ten (10) feet b.g.l. All analytes were discovered to have <br /> levels of contamination as none detectable for the 1-113-5 samples. EB-6 also had <br /> concentrations of Ethylb enzene, TCE,Benzene, Toluene, and Xylenes at 6, 8, and 10 feet b.g.l. <br /> 3.0 Scope of Work <br /> i <br /> _ On November 29, 1995, WHF Inc., in conjunction with SEMCO, a licensed environmental <br /> contractor from Modesto, California, removed the contents of the wastelbum pit, a concreted <br /> I cell (Figure 2). Approximately 29.86 tons (Appendix C) of soil was removed from the burn pit <br /> and placed on and covered with visdueen. This was done to prevent the contact of burn pit <br /> material with the around surface. The burn pit was primarily used for the disposal of <br /> unconsolidated debris andGarbage by incineration, as informed by a site worker. Once all <br /> contents were removed and stockpiled, four (4) seperate discrete soil samples, composited into <br /> one, were taken on February 16, 1996, from at least two (2) feet in depth into the spoils pile <br /> (Table 1, Appendix A). <br /> On March 6, 1996, WIU, Inc., conducted six (6) hand borings, RB-1 through R13-6 (Figure <br /> 2), to an approximate depth of 2.5 feet b.g.l. in the same area where contamination was <br /> previously identified in ERMs report dated April 15, 1995. Samples were taken at a deeper <br /> depth, 2.5 feet instead of off the top surface of the soil. This was accomplished to investigate <br /> and identify contamination posses an impact to the environmental conditions at the site. <br /> 3.1 Soil Sampling <br /> Soil samples, associated with the burn/waste pit, were taken in 1'/z" by 6" brass sleeves <br /> from at least two (2) feet into the spoils pile. All surface samples were conducted in <br /> _ the same manner except to a depth of approximately 2.5 feet b.g.l. The soil samples <br /> were then collected using a drive hammer sampler and spoon. The laboratory samples <br /> did not have any head space and were immediately sealed in their liners using aluminum <br /> foil-lined caps. They were then labeled and placed in an ice chest cooled with Blue <br /> Ice®. The samples were then delivered to the State-certified laboratory, California <br /> Laboratory Services, Inc., in Rancho Cordova California. <br /> 3.1 Requested Analyses <br /> The composited sample, CPS-2-(1, 2, 3, & 4), was collected for laboratory analysis <br /> s <br /> and analyzed using EPA method 6010/7000 for TTLC and STLC CAM Metals (Table <br />