My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0014093
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
P
>
POCK
>
2706
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
PA-2100062
>
SU0014093
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/10/2025 4:23:22 PM
Creation date
5/25/2021 7:58:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0014093
PE
2611 - SUBDIVISION - MAJOR (SU)
STREET_NUMBER
2706
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
POCK
STREET_TYPE
LN
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95205
APN
17912013, 11, 14
CURRENT_STATUS
Closed - Issued
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\gmartinez
Supplemental fields
Site Address
2706 S POCK LN STOCKTON 95205
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1838
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
VMT measures the number and length of vehicle trips made on a daily basis (GHD <br />2020). The project site is not within one-half mile of an existing major transit stop or a <br />stop along an existing high-quality transit corridor. The project is not expected to <br />decrease VMT in the project area; in fact, it would add VMT. As noted in a) above, the <br />project would typically generate a maximum of 120 daily trips, which is above the 110 <br />daily trip threshold. <br />The County has decided to utilize a 15% reduction in baseline VMT per capita as the <br />threshold of significance for residential projects. The baseline residential VMT was <br />determined to be 23.6 per capita; therefore, the resulting threshold of 15% below baseline <br />would be 20.1 per capita (TJKM 2021). TJKM conducted a project VMT analysis for the <br />County using the SJCOG 2018 RTP computer model. The results of the modeling, <br />presented in a memorandum available in Appendix G, indicated that the average daily <br />VMT per capita with the project would be 14.6, which would be less than the 20.1 <br />County threshold (TJKM 2021). Therefore, the project would not conflict with CEQA <br />Guidelines Section 15064.3, subdivision (b). Project impacts would be less than <br />significant. <br />c) Traffic Hazards. <br />Project construction would involve movement of construction equipment onto and from <br />the site, which would be different in character from existing traffic in the vicinity. <br />Construction work would also directly affect Pock Lane with proposed frontage <br />improvements and utility connections associated with the two projects. Construction <br />traffic would be temporary and would cease when work is completed. <br />As discussed in Sections 3.15, Public Services, and 3.16, Recreation, the project could <br />lead to an increase in demand for school and recreational services. These demands may <br />fall particularly on facilities near the project site, mainly Kennedy Park and Hamilton <br />Elementary School. Adults and children residing in the proposed development may <br />choose to walk to these facilities, which would require crossing Pock Lane and Loomis <br />Road. Neither of these roads currently have crosswalks. Moreover, Pock Lane has a <br />substantial amount of traffic, including truck traffic. Thus, pedestrians attempting to cross <br />these roadways, in particular Pock Lane, would present potential safety concerns. <br />The Traffic Impact Study identified substantial gaps in pedestrian facilities along Pock <br />Lane in the project vicinity. In order to reduce the hazard of pedestrians crossing Pock <br />Lane near the project sites, the study recommended that the project install a high <br />visibility crosswalk across Pock Lane at Loomis Road, preferably with flashing crossing <br />signs to alert drivers to pedestrians waiting to cross. It also recommends that the County <br />consider closing the small gap between Loomis Road and the northeast corner of 3009 <br />Pock Lane. Mitigation described below would address the potential safety issue <br />associated with pedestrian crossing of roadways, thereby reducing impacts to a level that <br />would be less than significant. <br />Level of Significance: Potentially significant <br />Mitigation Measures: <br />Pock Lane Public Review Draft IS/MND 3-66 May 2022 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.