Laserfiche WebLink
survey, Solano Archaeological Services also conducted outreach to local tribes identified <br />on a list provided by the Native American Heritage Commission. <br />Environmental Setting <br />As noted in Section 3.5, Cultural Resources, the project site is within the traditional <br />territory of the Northern Valley Yokuts. The Northern Valley Yokuts occupied the land <br />on either side of the San Joaquin River from the Delta to south of Mendota. The Diablo <br />range probably marked the Yokuts' western boundary, and the eastern edge would have <br />lain along the Sierra Nevada foothills. The late prehistoric Yokuts who resided in the area <br />may have been the largest ethnic group in pre -contact California, being organized into at <br />least 11 small political units or tribes. Each tribe had a population of approximately 300 <br />people, most of whom lived within one principal settlement that usually had the same <br />name as the political unit. Within the villages, structures included sweathouses, <br />ceremonial chambers, and oval single-family dwellings made of tule. The closest <br />documented Yokuts village site to the project area was Yachik, which was located about <br />four miles northeast of the project site. <br />As Spanish control solidified over California during the early 1800s, many Yokuts were <br />lured or captured by missionaries and taken to Mission San Jose or Santa Clara. Further <br />impacts on the Yokuts lifeways came with an epidemic in 1833, possibly malaria, that <br />decimated the indigenous population, killing thousands. Continued difficulties came with <br />the influx of Euro -Americans during the Gold Rush era that further reduced the <br />population because of disease and violent relations with the miners. Though there was no <br />gold in the Yokuts territory, miners passing through on their way to the diggings caused <br />upheaval. In addition, many former miners who had seen the richness of the San Joaquin <br />Valley on their way to the gold fields later returned to settle and farm the area, further <br />restricting Native American access to their traditional lands. <br />In 2015, the California Legislature enacted AB 52, which focuses on consultation with <br />Native American tribes to avoid or mitigate potential impacts on tribal cultural resources, <br />which are defined as "sites, features, places, cultural landscapes, sacred places, and <br />objects with cultural value to a California Native American tribe." When a tribe requests <br />consultation with a CEQA lead agency on projects within its traditionally and culturally <br />affiliated geographical area, the lead agency must provide the tribe with notice of a <br />proposed project within 14 days of a project application being deemed complete or when <br />the lead agency decides to undertake the project if it is the agency's own project. The <br />tribe has up to 30 days to respond to the notice and request consultation; if consultation is <br />requested, then the local agency has up to 30 days to initiate consultation. <br />Matters which may be subjects of AB 52 consultation include the type of CEQA <br />environmental review necessary, the significance of tribal cultural resources, and project <br />alternatives or appropriate measures for preservation or mitigation of the tribal cultural <br />resource that the tribe may recommend to the lead agency. The consultation process ends <br />when either (1) the resource in question is not considered significant, (2) the parties agree <br />to mitigate or avoid a significant effect on a tribal cultural resource, or (3) a party, acting <br />in good faith and after reasonable effort, concludes that mutual agreement cannot be <br />Pock Lane Public Review Draft IS/MND 3-68 May 2022 <br />