Laserfiche WebLink
Other mandates that would reduce GHG emissions include reducing per capita water <br />consumption and imposing waste management standards to reduce methane and other <br />GHGs from solid wastes. <br />As discussed in Section 3.6, Energy, the project would be subject to codes that require <br />energy efficiency measures, which would reduce the amount of electricity produced by <br />fossil fuels — a major source of GHG emissions. Also, as discussed in Section 3.6, <br />attainment of the targets of the Renewables Portfolio Standard would reduce the amount <br />of electricity generated by fossil fuels, further reducing GHG emissions from energy <br />sources. <br />Based on the information provided above, the project would be consistent with GHG <br />reduction plans of the State and with the County General Plan policy on mitigation of <br />GHG emissions. Project impacts related to consistency with GHG emission reduction <br />plans would be less than significant. <br />3.9 HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS <br />Would the project: <br />a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the <br />environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal <br />of hazardous materials? <br />b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the <br />environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and <br />accident conditions involving the release of hazardous <br />materials into the environment? <br />c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely <br />hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter <br />mile of an existing or proposed school? <br />d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of <br />hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government <br />Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a <br />significant hazard to the public or the environment? <br />e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, <br />where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of <br />a public airport or public -use airport, would the project result <br />in a safety hazard or excessive noise for people residing or <br />working in the project area? <br />f) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an <br />adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation <br />plan? <br />g) Expose people or structures, either directly or indirectly, <br />to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving <br />wildland fires? <br />Less Than <br />Significant <br />Potentially with <br />Significant Mitigation <br />Impact Incorporated <br />Less Than <br />Significant <br />Impact No Impact <br />Pock Lane Public Review Draft IS/MND 3-38 May 2022 <br />