Laserfiche WebLink
Air Sparging Pilot Test Related Activities Report and Remedial Action Work Plan <br />Former Countryside Market, Stockton, California April 30, 2015 <br />groundwater level in response to both initiation and changes in flow rate, the groundwater levels <br />quickly returned to background levels for the duration of each phase of testing. <br />Groundwater levels in the observation wells returned to background levels within approximately 20 <br />to 30 minutes after air injection was ceased, and the measured displacements during testing were <br />confirmed to not be the result of changes in barometric pressures. <br />4.4.5 Dissolved Oxygen Monitoring (AS-1 Testing) <br />Approximate background (i.e. pre-injection) DO levels in milligrams per liter (mg/L) recorded were <br />as follows: 2.4 (OBS-1); 0.9 (AS-1), and 0 (MW-5). <br />DO concentrations increased rapidly to approximately 12 mg/L in well OBS-1 (located 15 feet from <br />AS-1) and remained at the same level during the low-flow, medium-flow, and high-flow steps. An <br />increase to approximately 8.5 mg/L indicates DO saturation, typical of an air flow path directly <br />intersecting the well (i.e. bubbling in the water column). DO concentrations in well AS-2 (20 feet <br />from AS-1) decreased slightly during the flow steps. DO levels in MW-5 remained generally <br />constant during the course of the test. Observed DO during AS test in AS-1 are presented on <br />Graph 1C. <br />Continued DO measurements were recorded in the observation wells with the data loggers after <br />injection was ceased. After injection was stopped, the DO concentration fell slightly in well OBS-1 <br />for three hours from approximately 12 to 11 mg/L, followed by a more gradual decline over the next <br />eight hours to approximately 10 mg/L. Note that a more significant decline in DO levels over this <br />time frame likely occurred as such elevated readings are not generally feasible without a sustained <br />source of air/oxygen. As a result, it is suspected that a DO sensor calibration problem occurred <br />sometime near the end of the first test as these unusually high levels were maintained at the start <br />of the second test, as described in Section 4.5. DO readings (raw data) recorded by the data <br />loggers deployed in wells OBS-1, MW-5, and AS-2 are provided in Appendix J. <br />4.4.6 Oxidation-Reduction Potential Monitoring (AS-1 Testing) <br />Pre-injection ORP levels in OBS-1 and AS-2 were approximately 64 millivolts (mV) and 127 mV, <br />respectively. During the low-, medium-, and high-flow steps, ORP levels in OBS-1 increased to a <br />maximum of approximately 110 mV and rose slightly following the test to approximately 115 mV <br />(Graph 1D). ORP levels in AS-2 were effectively unchanged during the low-flow step as the <br />readings only decreased slightly to approximately 115 mV. During the medium-flow step, ORP <br />levels in AS-2 increased to approximately 125 mV and remained at approximately 125 mV during <br />the high-flow step (Graph 1D). ORP levels in AS-2 quickly returned to pre-testing levels of <br />approximately 110 mV following the test. Note that the ORP readings did not exhibit a strong <br />correlation with the DO level data although a marked increase did occur in well OBS-1 after low- <br />flow injection was initiated. Sparging did not have a nneasureable influence on ORP in MW-5. <br />ORP readings (raw data) recorded by the data loggers deployed in wells OBS-1 AS-2 and MW-5 <br />are provided Appendix J. <br />4-6 The Source Group, Inc.