Laserfiche WebLink
Air Sparging Pilot Test Related Activities Report and Remedial Action Work Plan <br />Former Countryside Market, Stockton, California April 30, 2015 <br />The field monitoring data (tabulated) collected during the test is provided as Appendix I and <br />observation well head pressure readings are presented in Graph 2A. <br />4.5.4 Groundwater Level Changes (AS-2 Testing) <br />Groundwater mounding is a potential indication of AS influence since the rise in groundwater levels <br />is attributable to the addition of air into the saturated zone at or near that location. To monitor for <br />the effect of air injection into AS-2, groundwater levels were monitored before, during, and after the <br />injection phase of testing using the data loggers. Graph 2B shows changes in water levels versus <br />time (raw Troll data provided in Appendix J). <br />Apparent displacement was observed in observation wells OBS-1 and AS-1 during each step of <br />testing. The groundwater levels in each observation well showed slight increases in response to <br />initiation of air sparge testing and changes in air sparge flow rate. After an initial increase in <br />groundwater level in response to both initiation and changes in flow rate, the groundwater levels <br />quickly returned to background levels for the duration of each phase of testing. MW-5 showed no <br />apparent change in groundwater level in response to air sparge activities. <br />Groundwater levels in the observation wells returned to background levels within approximately <br />20 to 30 minutes after air injection was ceased, and the measured displacements during testing <br />were confirmed to not be the result of changes in barometric pressures. <br />4.5.5 Dissolved Oxygen Monitoring (AS-2 Testing) <br />Approximate background (i.e. pre-injection) DO levels for AS-2 testing were elevated from actual <br />background levels from AS-1 testing on January 27, 2015. DO levels in OBS-1 recovered to <br />approximately 10.5 mg/L prior to commencement of the low-flow (2 scfm) and held at that level <br />through the low-flow step of AS-2 testing. As discussed previously, the actual DO concentration <br />prior to the start of the second test was likely at or near the background level of 2.4 mg/L measured <br />in well OBS-1 prior to the start of the first test. As a result, relative changes in DO levels were used <br />to evaluate the feasibility of sparging during AS-2 testing. During medium-flow testing (7.5 scfm), <br />DO levels in OBS-1 rose to approximately 12.5 mg/L. During high-flow testing (15 scfm) DO levels <br />in OBS-1 rose to approximately 13 mg/L. Following AS-2 testing DO levels in OBS-1 continued to <br />gradually decline to a concentration of 9.72 mg/L when the data logger was extracted from the well <br />on January 29, 2015. <br />DO concentrations in MW-5 did not change significantly during AS-2 testing. DO concentration <br />data for AS-2 testing are presented in Graph 2C. DO readings (raw data) recorded by the data <br />loggers deployed in wells OBS-1, AS-1, and MW-5 are provided in Appendix J. <br />4.5.6 Oxidation-Reduction Potential Monitoring (AS-2 Testing) <br />Pre-injection ORP levels in OBS-1 (7.5 feet from AS-2) and MW-5 (42 feet from AS-2) were <br />approximately 116 mV and -380 mV, respectively. ORP readings in AS-1 began immediately prior <br />to commencement with a value of 117 mV. During low, medium, and high-flow testing, ORP levels <br />4-9 The Source Group, Inc.